CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1127DEC002271493

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 1995

27 novembre 1995

       The article goes on to state that Mr. Androsch did not present any new arguments, while his counsel tried to describe him as a victim of politics.

Page 77 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC002905615

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2015

20 octobre 2015

    The applicants complained under Article 2 of the Convention that the State had failed to fulfil its procedural obligation to investigate the death of their son.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD004667306

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2016

30 juin 2016

    On 7 June 2006 the applicant lodged a statement of intent with the Court of Appeal to appeal against the decision of 2 June 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531DEC001121502

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2005

31 mai 2005

In the version applicable until 1 September 2004, Article 417 § 1, which lays down a general rule, read as follows: “The State Treasury shall be liable for damage caused by a State official in the performance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC000215812

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

Management Decree, what volume of church bell ringing is allowed during what part of the day. ... 2.3.6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0919JUD001688008

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2013

19 septembre 2013

He was further informed that he would start serving the sentence on 15 March 2002 in Štip Prison. The prison was also informed of the start date of the prison sentence. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC000629304

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

However, their statements were not used against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC004944808

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2016

3 mai 2016

    In finding the applicant guilty, the first-instance court relied on the statements of the five victims, including pre-trial statements by the head of the prison department and the prison

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007652212

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

There is also no information in the case-file as to whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant have ended in the meantime and if so what the outcome was. II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD004624807

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2017

28 mars 2017

It submitted that a criminal investigation into injuries caused to an individual while in police custody should start from the premise that the police officers therewith the individual at the relevant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113JUD008090912

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

    Meanwhile, the case file was forwarded to the Split Municipal State Attorney’s Office ( Općinsko državno odvjetništvo u Splitu – “the State Attorney’s Office”) for its assessment of the relevant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0119JUD005949100

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2006

19 janvier 2006

Three of the alleged founders ... have not signed the minutes of 26 October 1997, while the minutes state that the resolution for the founding of the association was adopted by unanimity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0503DEC005094399

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2001

3 mai 2001

The Court notes, however, that the present application is directed against a State that has ratified the Convention and against a decision by the state authorities to decrease the applicant’s pension.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220JUD004209102

Admin. suprême

20 février 2007

20 février 2007

    While the proceedings were pending before the Supreme Administrative Court, on 24 February 1999 the Prime Minister agreed to appoint the applicant to a similar post in BEDAŞ.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909REP003054696

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

found disclose a breach by the State concerned of its obligations under the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC004540504

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

    As the applicant did not resign from his full-time employment, the payment of the EWK pension did not start. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0725JUD003780908

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2019

25 juillet 2019

Her poor state of health and her inability to participate in the trial formed the basis for that decision. 12 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD000956610

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

    By a letter of 7 August 2009 the court forwarded the lawyer’s statement to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002593594

Admin. suprême

28 février 1996

28 février 1996

       Section 8(1) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 states that it is a contempt of court to obtain, disclose or solicit any particulars of any statements made, opinions expressed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304DEC002723895

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1998

4 mars 1998

by the Secretary of State.

Source officielle