CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 012 résultats pour « Mompion »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3972

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2005

8 mars 2005

existence of a victim, that is to say, an individual who is personally affected by an alleged violation of a Convention right, is indispensable for putting the protection mechanism of the Convention into motion

Source officielle

Page 77 sur 351

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0315REP001305787

Admin. suprême

15 mars 1990

15 mars 1990

  The House of Representatives proceeded to pass a motion proposed by Mr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002669595

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1998

10 juillet 1998

It pointed out that under the special procedure for granting recognition to associations, the inquisitorial system allowed the court to take into account, of its own motion, matters which had not been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD000973706

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

According to the applicant, the District Court never addressed those motions. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0729JUD004229798

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2004

29 juillet 2004

On 21   August 1991 KC filed a motion for discovery by the applicant. On 24   October 1991 the High Court struck out this motion and costs were awarded against KC.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0423JUD005919608

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2013

23 avril 2013

Section 211 “(3) At the session the party [that is, the prosecution] having submitted the motion [on ordering or prolonging pre-trial detention] shall present the evidence substantiating the motion in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204DEC002332716

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

    They explained that, on the one hand, ‘abstention’ ( astensione ) was a legal instrument through which a judge, of his own motion, requested the Judge for Extraordinary Remedies ( Giudice

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD006167900

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

    On 4 November 1998 the applicant lodged a motion with the court to have the judge dealing with his case withdrawn from the proceedings. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1125JUD001041804

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2010

25 novembre 2010

On 26 February and 10   October 2002 the hearings were adjourned to give the applicant time to adjust his claims for non-pecuniary damage and to resolve an unspecified motion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-140577

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2013

6 novembre 2013

This far-reaching amendment obliges the OSLPC to include in its motion requesting institutional care that the reasons for filing such a motion are not housing conditions and the material situation of parents

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD001829713

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2018

22 novembre 2018

    The applicant complained that the Berlin Tiergarten District Court did not appoint, of its own motion, defence counsel for him in the first-instance criminal proceedings before it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0724JUD004854599

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2007

24 juillet 2007

The court examined the applicant’s continued detention on its own motion every one and a half months or two months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14247

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

The CERPA, which lacked the attributes of an “independent and impartial tribunal established by law”, had exclusive competence to deal with any motion for the exclusion of judges involving a plea of lack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708DEC006574501

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

On 27 September 1999 the Oldenburg Regional Court rejected the applicant’s motion for bias.

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2010:SO02076

Cassation

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

la procédure au titre des articles L 1233-34 du code du travail ; que la lecture de son procès-verbal permet de constater que les représentants du personnel ont quitté la séance après avoir voté une motion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC004322519

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

In particular, the applicants had failed to establish that any person had been treated differently from them, while being in a comparable situation, that is in a situation of having failed to motion for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0123JUD002377902

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2007

23 janvier 2007

    On 9 March 2000 the Regional Court asked the applicant to supplement his motion and to provide a detailed statement concerning his financial situation. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0308JUD000445903

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2007

8 mars 2007

The Novocherkassk Town Court accepted the motion in respect of the presiding judge and appointed a new judge, B. It appears that the first hearing was fixed for 29 April 1999. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111861

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2012

14 juin 2012

    Pre-trial statements of a victim or a witness, who is absent during the trial, may be read out in the court upon the motion of one of the parties or upon the own motion of the court (Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140562

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2013

6 novembre 2013

This far-reaching amendment obliges the OSLPC to include in its motion requesting institutional care that the reasons for filing such a motion are not housing conditions and the material situation of parents

Source officielle