[X] et Mme [I] ont saisi, en référé, le tribunal judiciaire de Libourne.

: AU FOND Grosse délivrée le : aux avocats Décision déférée à la cour : jugement d'orientation rendu le 10 novembre 2022 (R.G. 22/00021) par le Juge de l'exécution de LIBOURNE

de la décision : AU FOND Grosse délivrée le : aux avocats Décision déférée à la Cour : jugement rendu le 21 juin 2019 (R.G. 2018002451) par le Tribunal de Commerce de LIBOURNE

Libre Jamais condamné Appelant, citation transformée en procès-verbal de recherches du 28 octobre 2008, absent, représenté par maître FRIBOURG, avocat au barreau de LIBOURNE.

In such cases, the Court must establish whether the other grounds given by the judicial authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty (see Contrada v.

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

The applicant’s deprivation of liberty had therefore been shown to have been necessary in the circumstances of her case.

He failed to bring a civil action for compensation under Articles   23 and   24 read in conjunction with Article   448 of the Civil Code whereby persons deprived of their liberty who had

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article

He relied on Article   5   § 4 of the Convention which provides: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness

The Government argued that his pre-trial detention had not lasted a long time and that the courts had provided adequate reasoning for his deprivation of liberty. 10.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-f - Expulsion;Article 5-4 - Procedural

They relied on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to liberty of movement, contrary to Article   2 of Protocol No.   4?

If so; (i)     Did his deprivation of liberty during the relevant period fall under any of the sub-paragraphs of Article 5 § 1?

Grosse délivrée le : 14 janvier 2026 aux avocats Décision déférée à la Cour : jugement rendu le 14 novembre 2023 (R.G. 2023001583) par le Tribunal de Commerce de LIBOURNE