CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 603 résultats pour « Lacquit »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD004339118

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2021

12 octobre 2021

    invited the authorities to inform the Committee whether the legal provision which does not allow the awarded compensation to exceed the value of the object of the lawsuit needs to be further

Page 77 sur 81

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC92 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

ENTREPRISE LACQUIT

SIREN 892507179Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de cusset

09/07/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

BORSIER LACQUIT

SIREN 449908920Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

21/04/2026

Voir →

Radiations

LACQUIT, Sylvie

SIREN 948013313Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Clermont-Ferrand

15/04/2026

Voir →

Radiations

LACQUIT, Maxime

SIREN 928139039Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Châlon-sur-Saône

15/04/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

FREDERIC LACQUIT AUTOMOBILES

SIREN 530123843Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de melun

02/02/2026

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD006402311

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2021

18 mai 2021

    Referring further to the money allocated by the local council for the purposes of the lawsuit against the applicant organisation, it was stated: “To what extent is it lawful or expedient

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD001429003

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2010

14 janvier 2010

    On 24 December 2001 Ms Odintsova filed a separate lawsuit against the Ministry of Defense, claiming compensation in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD003558215

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2022

1 mars 2022

  THE LAWSUIT INTRODUCED BY THE APPLICANT 11 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD004910811

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

    The Government submitted that the applicant had brought a specific type of tort action, namely a defamation lawsuit under Article 152 of the Civil Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003026213

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2022

24 mars 2022

fifth chapter of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning judicial review of administrative authorities’ decisions does not contain a comprehensive legal regulation for the renegotiation of a private lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD002157508

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

pointed out that, whereas in his initial request of 28   June 2006 to the prison authorities the applicant had specifically asked for access to the Ministry’s website (see paragraph 8 above), in his lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529DEC005744010

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

    At the material time, the fee for filing a lawsuit before a city court or a district court was 4,300 Norwegian Krone (NOK), corresponding to approximately 560   euros (EUR), if the hearing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC003414296

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1999

7 septembre 1999

    In case a federation or union decline to instigate proceedings for their members the party concerned is authorised to file the lawsuit himself, but prior to a writ of summons being issued

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0216JUD001414215

Admin. suprême

16 février 2023

16 février 2023

CIVIL LAWSUIT AGAINST THE MINISTRY OF PRISONS 37 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008DEC005155007

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2013

8 octobre 2013

    Where the debtors refused to comply with their obligation the applicant company initiated lawsuits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD005820714

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

effectively respond to any incidents of hate speech, discrimination, violence or alleged hate crime, including through the Internet, by banning the operation of racist associations and facilitating civil lawsuits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD002511403

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

Accordingly, their lawsuits in Russian military courts could not be qualified as “civil” and the applicants’ complaints were incompatible ratione materiae with the Convention. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD002162313

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

  Hungary (no. 65681/13, 13 January 2015), arguing that, under the current Hungarian jurisprudence, the legislature could not be held liable for its actions; and any such lawsuit against the legislature

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD003632522

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2025

4 décembre 2025

Protection against reprisal “Any adverse treatment or negative effect suffered by a person as a result of lodging a complaint, claim, report, lawsuit or appeal of any kind, intended to prevent discrimination

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD005487208

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2012

20 novembre 2012

    In reply to the lawsuit, the Anykščiai Facility acknowledged that the establishment did not meet the domestic legal hygiene requirements, but argued that its administration was not to blame

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD001366507

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

premises to the facts of the present case, I hold the view, unlike the majority, that this is not a fourth-instance case but rather a case of lack of access to a court in respect of legal malpractice lawsuits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD005213219

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

However, in that judge’s view: “... the practice of disciplining its own (and other) journalists by bringing lawsuits [against them] does not seem to fit into ‘the highest ethical principles’ and certainly

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003583505

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

Further, the applicants had neither filed criminal complaints nor brought separate civil lawsuits based on the Obligations Act, the Serbian Constitution, or, for that matter, directly on the basis of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906DEC002255605

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2007

6 septembre 2007

Under Tunisian procedural law it was prohibited for any person (irrespective of his or her occupation or authority), who was not a party to the lawsuit or who had not intervened during the legal case (

Source officielle