on 26 January 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

complaints related to the excessive length of certain civil proceedings and to the absence of any effective remedy;   Whereas in its judgment of 29 April 2003 the Court unanimously:   -   held

on 26 January 1993, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 19 October 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 7 April 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

on 11 September 1995, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

before the Court by the Government of Greece on 9   December 1996;   Whereas in its judgment of 26 November 1997, the Court unanimously: - rejected the Government's preliminary objections; - held

The applicant, in his capacity as trade union leader, decided to help them. According to him, such help was “an indirect expression of his own opinion”.

Il qualifia la famille de «   voisins diaboliques   » ( neighbours from hell ), expression qui fut reprise par la suite dans des journaux locaux et nationaux.

It held that there was a risk that the applicant might abscond or commit new crimes and that he was suspected of having committed three crimes.

On 26 April 2005 the first hearing was held. Between October 2005 and April 2008 the court held fourteen   hearings, ten were cancelled and three hearings were adjourned.

On 4, 7 and 18   September 1995 the court held hearings. It ordered to adduce further expert evidence. Subsequently, several new expert opinions were obtained by the court.

  For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance

    The plaintiffs, but not M.V., attended the first hearing in the case that was held on 11   December 1991. M.V.'

, it being specified that the total amount may not exceed three times the lump sum of EUR 50 for each month of “erasure”. 25.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3. (The judgment is available only in French.)

    On 22 September 2011, while he was being held at Kaunas Remand Prison, the applicant had his first myocardial infarction.

The court held, referring to Articles 1099.1 and 1099.2 of the Civil Code, that the bank therefore had to be held liable for the civil offence (delict) committed by its employees (see paragraph 53 below

Consequently, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.