Attendance at the hearing of the plea of nullity 36.

A hearing was held on 26 January 1998.

The applicant personally filed submissions and maintains that he also unsuccessfully requested leave to attend the hearing.

    At a hearing held on 22 September 2008 the court heard the applicant. The two witnesses failed to attend the hearing. 9.

events that have occurred at that hearing. 2.

The applicant, who had not been apprised of the hearing, was not present. He was not represented by counsel at the hearing. 10.

The applicant notified the court that he could not attend the hearing because he lived more than 10,000 kilometres away and his mobility was reduced.

At the hearing held on the latter date, the court decided to inform the accused that their defence submissions would be assumed to have been given if they did not attend the next hearing scheduled for

The Court is also cognisant of the applicant’s unavailability for hearings during two summer months in 2003, an absence at a hearing linked to his illness and his failure to appear at the hearing of 13

On 18 October 1999 the County Court concluded the preliminary hearing and decided to hold the trial hearing on 20 December 1999.

    In camera hearings 11.

    Another hearing took place on 30 August 1995. An expert witness failed to appear at the hearing.

The fee for that hearing alone was some 9,300 euros.

Turkey 22/09/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 5 43721/20 Akdağ v.

However, the obligation to hold an oral hearing for the purposes of hearing a witness or an expert is limited to situations where such a hearing is necessary in order to clarify the matter.

  In proceedings before a court of first and only instance the right to a "public hearing" in the sense of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) may entail an entitlement to an oral hearing (see, e.g., Eur

    A special court hearing for that purpose took place on 26 January 2007 in a hearing room in Lovech Prison. 8.

If he were to pursue his request for a hearing the applicant was to inform the Court of the evidence he wanted to invoke at the hearing and what he wanted to show.

Under these circumstances, it was necessary to hold a fresh oral hearing.