In September 2012 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant on suspicion of aggravated misappropriation of communal property, forgery of official documents and money laundering

The applicant and his accomplice were charged with forgery of official documents. 6.

    On 25 November 2010 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant and eight other co-accused in respect of fraud, forgery, use of forged documents, and money-laundering offences

    On 11 January 2011 the applicant was arrested in the context of a criminal investigation into abuse of power, breach of home security and forgery of documents.

    On 27 October 1999 an investigator from the Sverdlovsk Regional Prosecutor’s office questioned the applicant about his involvement in forgery of documents in August 1998.

  On 15 May 1984, he was brought before the investigating judge (rechter-commissaris) who charged him with having accepted bribes, and with fraud, forgery and use of forged documents.

      Meanwhile, in a decision (auto de procesamiento) of 2 February 1993, the investigating judge in Puerto de la Cruz had formally charged the applicant with, inter alia, rape and forgery

The applicant was found not guilty of the first and second charge, guilty of the third charge (under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981) and consequently no finding was made on the fourth charge.

   Following a criminal investigation, the two applicants were charged with forgery and corruption.   At the time, Mr Masson was the Investments Manager of ABP.

On 1   September 2004 the applicant was further accused of forgery of an official document in relation to the bribe from Mr M.

However, by the same ruling the tax police instituted criminal proceedings against ATI officials on suspicion of document forgery. 20.

of Criminal Procedure Law (Cap. 155; see paragraph 116 below) on the ground that there had been reasonable suspicion based on evidence that he had been involved in a conspiracy to commit a felony, forgery

He had been subjected to disciplinary action and prosecuted under Article 319(1) of the Criminal Law (Failure of a State Official to Perform His Duties) and under Article 327(19) (Forgery of a Document

The applicant, for her part, had a criminal conviction in Lithuania for forgery of document and a criminal investigation against her for fraud had been terminated.

It also found the applicant guilty of the charges of fraud, forgery and use of forged documents, and gave her a three-year suspended sentence.

        On 1 June 1995 the Kraków Regional Court convicted the applicant of fraud and forgery and sentenced him to six years' imprisonment and a fine of PLN 5,000.

The applicant was suspected of, inter alia, obtaining credit by false pretences, forgery of documents and embezzlement. 7.     The applicant was arrested in Moscow on 30 September 1996.

    According to the applicant companies, they never entered into the Disputed Contract, which they assert is a forgery. Proceedings before the London Court of International Arbitration 9.

    On 17 July 2006 the criminal investigation started by the Prosecutor General's office on 16 May 2006 into the acts of smuggling and forgery was joined to the criminal investigation started