CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002818904
21 décembre 2010
, Series A no. 311) and only a narrow interpretation of those exceptions is consistent with the aim of that provision, namely to ensure that no one is arbitrarily deprived of his or her liberty (see Engel
Page 77 sur 84
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD003415596
15 juin 2004
noted that he was charged with, inter alia , one charge under the Theft Act 1968 and two charges under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 and that he was sentenced to four months’ imprisonment ( Engel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910JUD003401006
10 septembre 2013
The difference between deprivation and restriction of liberty is one of degree or intensity, and not of nature or substance (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, § 59, Series A no. 22
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD002120310
31 juillet 2012
Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV), and only a narrow interpretation of those exceptions is consistent with the aim of that provision (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1014JUD003768097
14 octobre 1999
must be his concrete situation, and account must be taken of a whole range of criteria such as the type, duration and manner of implementation of the measure in question (see the following judgments: Engel
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1005JUD000551313
5 octobre 2021
On 10 November 2015 at around 3.00 p.m. police officers arrested the applicant in Engels, the Saratov Region, on suspicion of mugging.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0606DEC003733197
6 juin 2000
They referred to the criteria developed by the Court in its case-law, particularly the Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976 (Series A no. 22) and the Öztürk v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0927JUD004490105
27 septembre 2012
alternative criteria laid down in the Court’s case-law, namely the classification of the offence in domestic law, the nature of the offence and the nature and severity of the penalty (see, in particular, Engel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD003625697
His close arrest amounted to detention involving as it did confinement to a cell under supervision ( Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, § 63). B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0506JUD000865879
6 mai 1985
mutandis, the Delcourt judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 15, para. 28) and exemplified in paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 (art. 6-3-d) ("under the same conditions" - see, mutatis mutandis, the Engel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0208JUD002486008
8 février 2011
41087/98, ECHR 2001 ‑ VII and Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22). 53.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1007DEC001188285
7 octobre 1987
Court H.R., Engel and others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22). The Government submit that this principle is relevant to Article 6 as a whole.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003JUD003756897
3 octobre 2002
accused's personality as part of the sentencing process, unless they are of such a nature and degree as to amount to the bringing of a new charge within the autonomous meaning of the Convention (see the Engel
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109588
9 janvier 2012
Pursuant to the current version – valid since 23 April 2004 – persons with whom the child has a close relationship ( enge Bezugspersonen) have a right to contact the child if it serves its best interests
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2011:CO00404
27 avril 2011
commerce de Cannes a arrêté le plan de sauvegarde d'ENGLISH CENTER et a désigné Maître Pierre-Louis X... en qualité de commissaire à l'exécution du plan ; que sur la concurrence déloyale, EPMF reproche à ENGL
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:CR03439
25 septembre 2012
qu'il a, par ailleurs, été mis en évidence que la société Total (Total SA) qui avait, par l'entremise de deux de ses filiales, conclu, le 21 mai 1999, un contrat de vente " à l'arrivée " avec la société ENEL
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002617195
17 janvier 1997
Court HR, Engel and Others v. Netherlands judgment of 6 June 1976, series A, no. 22, p. 38-39, para. 91).
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021REP002734795
21 octobre 1998
Court HR, Engel v. the Netherlands judgment of 18 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 33-36, paras. 80-85, Eur. Court HR, Eckle and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD006996601
2 novembre 2006
The appeal against that penalty did not, therefore, have any suspensive effect (contrast Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, § 68, Series A no. 22).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC002337894
18 octobre 1995
Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment of 1 October 1975, Series A no. 22, p. 37, para. 89).