Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0403JUD001027705
3 avril 2008
3 avril 2008
As regards the five hearings scheduled between 11 September 2000 and 17 April 2001 three were adjourned because the defendants did not attend, one was adjourned because one of the defendants
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179691
28 novembre 2017
28 novembre 2017
It also emphasised that disciplinary liability had been applied in respect of the applicant not because she had taken procedural actions, but because she had not performed her duties in a manner whereby
Source officielleChambre Commerciale
616343ec88dc29ccde27f058
1 septembre 2011
1 septembre 2011
de la Société SOGEDEC [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] défaillant COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DES DEBATS ET DU DELIBERE : Monsieur Daniel MULLER, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleChambre Commerciale
615e0dedc25a97f0381f5079
18 septembre 2014
18 septembre 2014
MEDINA de la SCP CDMF - AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de GRENOBLE, plaidant COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Madame Dominique ROLIN, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC007501212
31 mai 2016
31 mai 2016
By a decision of 16 January 1990 the local authorities decided to demolish the building because it was so dilapidated that it risked collapsing at any time and thus posed a risk to life and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC002112613
28 avril 2020
28 avril 2020
The State could no longer retrieve that sum because enforcement had become time-barred (see paragraph 18 above).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175012
9 juin 2017
9 juin 2017
In 2004 the proceedings were suspended because his whereabouts were unknown. They resumed in 2014 and are still pending.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175730
26 juin 2017
26 juin 2017
He complains under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that his detention was not lawful under domestic law, because it was too long.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164137
23 mai 2016
23 mai 2016
courts. complaint The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that, if he were to be expelled to Lebanon, he would risk being killed by Hezbollah due to legal issues in that country and because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161863
9 mars 2016
9 mars 2016
Applications nos. 12061/09 AĞGÖZ and 21773/09 KARTAL against Turkey lodged on 6 February 2009 and 9 April 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants, who are convicted prisoners, complain that because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219841
12 septembre 2022
12 septembre 2022
He complains under Article 3 of the Convention that his continued detention amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment because he is disabled and uses a wheelchair; however, he is detained in a
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202816
11 mai 2020
11 mai 2020
He complains under Article 3 of the Convention that his continued detention amounts to inhuman and degrading treatment because he is almost completely blind and the conditions in the prison are not appropriate
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180789
17 janvier 2018
17 janvier 2018
The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he did not have a fair hearing within the meaning of that article because the proceedings took place in his absence.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216007
3 février 2022
3 février 2022
against Russia lodged on 17 June 2021 communicated on 3 February 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s involuntary placement in a clinical infectious diseases hospital because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202148
4 mars 2020
4 mars 2020
The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted him without hearing anew the witnesses.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216649
2 mars 2022
2 mars 2022
The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted him without hearing anew the statements relied upon for the purposes of the conviction.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230205
15 décembre 2023
15 décembre 2023
TIRANE against Albania lodged on 10 November 2015 communicated on 15 December 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant company’s right of access to the Constitutional Court because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-195099
9 juillet 2019
9 juillet 2019
His application was rejected because the applicant had not sufficiently substantiated his identity.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-241566
25 novembre 2024
25 novembre 2024
PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, as a result of his disbarment because
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2402260_20240829
29 août 2024
29 août 2024
A B, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite par laquelle la préfète du Rhône a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour ; 2°) d'enjoindre à la préfète
Source officiellePage 77 sur 1499