No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

its application to the established facts, even if it also had jurisdiction in respect of the facts.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Munich. He and Mr W. founded the T.AG, a directory enquiries service.

verdict in assize court: no violation Facts – The applicant was committed to stand trial for the murder of her five children.

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

verdict given at first instance under summary procedure: no violation Facts – The applicants were tried under summary (simplified) proceedings, as they had requested, with a view to obtaining a reduction

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.

The Supreme Court noted the caution exercised by the Assize Court (self-caution) and the fact that it had assessed R.’s credibility in a thorough and fair manner.

The applicant complained that evidence resulting from that police operation had been used in criminal proceedings against him, in breach of his right to a fair trial. THE FACTS 2.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Jihlava. He was represented by Mr F. Seifert, a lawyer practising in Prague. 3.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant company is a legal entity registered in Mažeikiai. 6.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Bucharest. He was represented by Ms P. Corduneanu, a lawyer practising in Bucharest. 3.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1994 and lives in Bayburt. She was represented by Mr M. Timur, a lawyer practising in Van. 3.

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Ljubljana.