proceedings, if requested, most appropriate form of redress, without prejudice to any general measures that may be required to prevent or redress other similar violations • Not justified to make any awards

  Furthermore, the Government maintain, C's statements were only a minor element in the accumulated evidence and the courts were fully aware of the secondary nature of this piece of evidence.

Ruling on an equitable basis, the Court awards each applicant EUR 10,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. B.     Costs and expenses 89.

Ambassador Carlo Jagmetti, who has represented Switzerland abroad for 34 years, was clearly aware of the explosive nature of his strategy paper, dated 19 December 1996, on the subject of unclaimed Jewish

There is progressive tumour growth: the tumour currently measures 15x14 centimetres, protrudes from the surface of the skin and pierces it with a vascular figure.

Moreover, the expert report of 30 July 2002 had not been the only piece of evidence before the court. The court had also relied on other medical documents and the parties’ submissions. 2.

seized, including several notebooks belonging to the first applicant, several telephone/address books, a world map published in 1986, a map of the Vayots Dzor Region of Armenia, a map of Sumgait, a piece

The applicant insisted that his superiors had been aware of and accepted his contacts with Japanese journalists. 1.

Pires de Lima for the applicant, as well as their replies to its questions. The Agent of the Government and counsel for the applicant filed several documents. 8.

  The Roma men ran away from the station, while Cheţan Crăciun was brought to the hospital, where he died about half an hour later.

The Roma ran away, while Cheţan Crăciun was brought to the hospital, where he died about half an hour later.

In finding the applicant guilty, the court also referred to various pieces of evidence, including, in particular, statements from four witnesses, the crime scene inspection report, three identification

It held that there were still a   number of pieces of evidence to be examined by the court and that, if released, the applicant would pose a risk of interfering with such evidence.

seized, including several notebooks belonging to the first applicant, several telephone/address books, a world map published in 1986, a map of the Vayots Dzor Region of Armenia, a map of Sumgait, a piece

    On 31 March 2006 the Court of Appeal, having reiterated the aforesaid pieces of evidence, upheld the judgment of 2   August 2004.

The accused is not personally acquainted with [Mr G.T.] and could not be aware of his personal and biographical background at the level of detail set out in the ‘explanations’.

The court concurred with the prosecutor’s view that the authorities had not been aware that M.P. had been a suicide risk, so as to confer liability on the officer.

The courts found that all the pieces of evidence in the case were consistent with each other and with the applicant's statements.

One of them was claimed to be a teacher from Pointe-à-Pitre, but this could not be positively established.