CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111DEC002174193
11 janvier 1995
Lacquet Ubbergen
Page 76 sur 81
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0424JUD000733306
24 avril 2007
The Government submitted that the applicants should not be awarded the full amount of legal costs as the lawsuits were unduly provoked by their statements.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002149193
29 novembre 1995
financial interest in the outcome of the proceedings before the Administrative Litigation Division: it paid for the soil-cleaning operation, it seized the property of the applicant company and it started a lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD003327505
25 septembre 2012
Upon the latter’s refusal, the applicant lodged a lawsuit before the Turkish courts seeking the payment of the due sums. 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD001722113
2 octobre 2018
statement critical of the administration of State affairs, even in situations where the official was not referred to by name or in an otherwise identifiable manner, journalists would be inundated with lawsuits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD006958401
6 octobre 2005
The Court of Appeal found that the outcome of at least part of the lawsuit depended on the conclusion of these auction proceedings.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC005243599
14 février 2006
Accordingly, the applicant considered that a lawsuit for defamation, as suggested by the Government, could not be considered an effective remedy for her Convention’ complaints currently before the Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0901DEC002234402
1 septembre 2005
An intervener joined the lawsuit as it was at the moment of the entry and from then on he was entitled to plead or undertake any other procedural action (except those amounting to dispositions with the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217DEC007109901
17 février 2004
The court shall, therefore, see in its line of duties that the parties exercise their rights properly throughout the procedure and meet the obligations they are bound to meet in the lawsuit.
5ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_25LY00111_20260423
23 avril 2026
Les Grands Communaux, représentée par Me Gauthier (cabinet Lacourte Raquin Tatar), demande à la cour : 1°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 19 novembre 2024 par lequel le préfet de la Côte-d’Or a rejeté sa demande
7éme chambre
DTA_2407122_20250703
3 juillet 2025
octobre 2024 et le 13 février 2025, la société civile de construction vente Atland Saint Rémy Chevincourt et la société civile de construction vente Promotion Immobilière, représentées par la SCP Lacourte
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD005991416
3 mai 2022
The Government also pointed out that the applicants had all agreed to co-sign the loan as guarantors, and by doing so they had accepted the risk of a lawsuit and the imposition of the relevant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD002002702
11 janvier 2007
Although the marking of the examination papers itself is not subject of the proceedings before the Court, it nevertheless illustrates the importance of the outcome of the lawsuit for the applicant (see
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD001950807
22 mars 2012
in Peru which led to a conclusion that legal aid had so far either been granted to legal persons straight away or not asked for in view of the fact that the maximum amount to be paid when filing a lawsuit
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD000443904
17 janvier 2008
which he was a founder amounted to a violation of his right to freedom of association, that the domestic courts were not independent and impartial, and that the domestic remedies were not effective in lawsuits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0703DEC002510105
3 juillet 2007
On 6 February 1957 IG Farben and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany (“Jewish Claims Conference”) entered into a friendly settlement during the course of a lawsuit brought by a former
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC001547202
In this context Mr Justice Stang Lund noted that the appellants' lawsuit and appeal to the Supreme Court had been directed against the KRL subject and its implementation generally.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD001234310
10 février 2011
control over independent media and the internet, interfered with the political opposition (among other things, by refusing to register a major opposition party), and brought politically motivated lawsuits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316JUD005849313
16 mars 2017
On 8 November 2010 Pressan published an article about comments made by A to a newspaper where he rejected all the allegations and threatened Pressan with a lawsuit for being the first to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD003653715
9 mars 2021
It read as follows: “OPEN LETTER TO Ms [M.M.], ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF TERUEL Ms [M.M.], With regard to judgment no. ... issued by your court in the lawsuit between [WBB] and the municipal council of Aguilar