had been brought into Moldova and before the electoral campaign had commenced, not to mention that it had happened before the creation of the applicant party.

That was evident from the fact that they had continued hitting him even after he had stopped moving because he had died.

It was only after concluding the agreement that she had realised that she had been deceived, and had therefore immediately appealed against it.

  24031 had been taken, and in particular the scene of the incident had been inspected, fragments of bombs had been seized, new expert examinations had been ordered, and the military commander of

As to the officer who had fired the fatal shot, the judge took the view that he had fired into the air without intent to kill and that he had in any event acted in self-defence in response to the violent

The remaining resources had not been considered lawful essentially as the applicant had been unable to prove that her husband had paid tax on his income from lawful employment abroad.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1, taken together with Article 6 § 3 (b) and (c) as the applicant had not had a fair trial.

Indeed, had the Constitutional Court found that the provision of the Ordinance, which had constituted the basis of the final decision in the case, had infringed the applicant company’s constitutional right

The remaining resources had not been considered lawful essentially as the applicant had been unable to prove that her husband had paid tax on his income from lawful employment abroad.

He submitted that he had been held in cell no. 24. Upon his arrival he had been given only an old dirty mattress, and no pillow or bed linen had been provided to him.

According to their statements, they knew the applicant and had had no conflicts with her.

She had called an ambulance and had been given an injection.

The group had stopped the applicant’s car and had explained his rights to him, but the applicant had refused to invite any witnesses.

the area, informing them that he had had suicidal intentions.

It observed that the autopsy conducted after the death had not produced any evidence to corroborate the allegations that the ears had been mutilated, and concluded that the left eye had been destroyed

The domestic courts had justified the use of these statements by the fact that the applicant had confessed to the investigator and not to the police officers and by the fact that both witnesses had made

The Government had not specified the circumstances in which the note had been obtained.

area where the applicant had been confined, the almost permanent supervision to which he had been subjected and the fact that it had been almost completely impossible for him to make social contacts.

When he had been asked whether the CCTV worked, the applicant had responded that the last time he had needed to check something (at Christmas time), it had been functioning properly.