Greece , no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, ECHR 2001–III; and Engel v. Hungary , no. 46857/06, § 26, 20 May 2010). 29.

  10615/83, Commission decision of 3 July 1984, D.R. 38, pp. 213-215), Engel and Others v.

witnesses; he must, in addition, support his request by explaining why it is important for the witnesses concerned to be heard and their evidence must be necessary for the establishment of the truth (see Engel

Switzerland , 12 July 1988, §   46, Series   A no. 140, and Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, §   91, Series A no. 22), the Court considers that the above considerations

the Government, between 8 and 11 p.m. on 8 October 2016 three mobile groups of officers of the Chechen law-enforcement agencies and the Dagestan CTC were checking cars on the road between Gersel and Engel-Yurt

  34952/07, §   24, 18   September 2018) or, in some circumstances, military rank (see   Engel and Others v.   the Netherlands , 8   June 1976, § 72, Series A no.

    In order to determine whether Article 6 is applicable under its “criminal” head, the Court will have regard to the three alternative criteria laid down in its case-law (see Engel and Others

and in combination with other factors, the lack of a seat belt or handles might give rise to concerns under Article 3, it nevertheless finds no aggravating factors in the instant case (compare with Engel

criteria are to be applied: the legal classification of the offence in domestic law, the nature of the offence and the nature and degree of severity of the possible penalty (see, among other authorities, Engel

of ill-treatment when they occur in the armed forces, provided they contribute to the specific mission of the armed forces in which they form part, for example training for battle-field conditions: Engel

Belgique du 18 novembre 1970, série A n° 12, p. 40, par. 76 ; Engel et autres c. Pays-Bas du 8 juin 1976, série A n° 22, p. 32, par. 77 ; Iribarne Perez c.

The Court had found in that case (§§ 61-63) and in Engel and Others v. the Netherlands (8 June 1976, § 72, Series A no. 22) and Shelley v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 23800/06, 4 January 2008) that

Ainsi, le 26 octobre 2004, un député prit la parole à l’Assemblée nationale en employant à l’égard des auteurs du rapport en question des expressions telles que «   intellos enrôlés   » ( entel

Il est représenté devant la Cour par M e Engül Çıtak, avocat au barreau d’Ankara. A.

d'immatriculation de l'emprunteur au Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés, ou le cas échéant extrait d'immatriculation au Répertoire des Métiers datant de moins de trois mois, s'il est tenu d'établit des comptes ennuels

[T] n'a fait que lui rajouter du travail, lui enveler du temps de travail et ne lui a pas apporté le matériel nécessaire pour travailler dans de bonnes conditions.

de chef de projet ne figurait plus sur les comptes rendus, l'employeur visant désormais soit la qualification de chef de projet junior, soit celle d'ingénieur d'études ou encore celle de " senior engeneer

Court HR, Engel v. the Netherlands judgment of 18 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 33-36, paras. 80-85, Eur. Court HR, Eckle and Others v.

Switzerland , 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140, and   Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 June 1976, § 91, Series A no. 22), the Court is in no position to assess when the applicant should