Lastly, the Government observed that the CCP required that the measure be reconsidered every thirty or sixty days, depending on the stage of the proceedings. (b)    The applicants 22 .

The applicant responded by defending the HCJ work, highlighting its increased number of meetings and efforts to evaluate judges, while also criticising S.Ç. for his role in the HCJ, alleging inconsistencies

    The Government disagreed and submitted that the warrant had been issued according to law, pursued the legitimate aim of defending public order and preventing crime, and was proportionate.

where the warning was impossible or impracticable in the circumstances; - endeavour to minimise the damage caused by the use of physical force, special equipment or a weapon, to the extent possible depending

  Depending on the political circumstances, they were called by various names: “Department of Public Security” ( Resort Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego ), subsequently renamed “Ministry of Public Security

or laws if: 1) a decision adopted on the basis of these acts has violated the constitutional rights or freedoms of the person, and 2) the person has exhausted all remedies provided for by law for defending

The applicant had subsequently chosen a   lawyer and had made no complaints in respect of how the lawyer had been defending his rights and interests.

The applicants averred that – within the deadlines set by the domestic courts – they should have had the right to submit evidence at any stage of the proceedings, depending on their strategy and the evidence

According to Section 97 (1) N°s 1 - 3, correspondence exchanged between the suspect and his defence counsel, as well as notes taken by defence counsel on information received from the suspect he is defending

), in so far as relevant, reads as follows: Article 86 “(1) Convicted persons serve their sentences in prisons which are determined by law. (2) Convicted persons are allocated to different prisons depending

On each occasion the authorities examined the applicant’s personal situation, namely his behaviour, and assessed the need to continue the application of the regime depending on the fresh assessment of

The European Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   6   §   1 on account of the major problems that the applicant had encountered in defending his case effectively

  Sweden (no. 2), 27 November 1992, § 90, Series A no. 250), and that in so doing, particular importance must be attached to the best interests of the child, which, depending on their nature and seriousness

In particular, they introduced a requirement of proving the fact of work during the war depending on the age of persons concerned.

With regard to complaints under Article 5 § 3, the Court has already considered that an appeal against a detention order, a request for release, whether submitted to the prosecutor or to the court, depending

persecution of political opposition and religious groups and the use of oppressive methods (including torture) (see, for example, Tajikistan 2016/2017 and Tajikistan: A year of secrecy, growing fears and deepening

          Thereupon, the applicants all individually instituted summary proceedings demanding suspensive effect for the duration of their appeal proceedings in the

opinions concerning just the applicant’s state of health, but were in fact opinions on the possible causal connection between his former occupation and his respiratory diseases and thus much more demanding

since it was contrary to Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 14 of the Convention, challenged the Act in civil proceedings against the State before the Regional Court ( rechtbank ) of The Hague, demanding

stripping him and handcuffing his hands and feet to a chair, beating him with rubber batons, administering electric shocks and kicking him on the soles of his feet, back, ribs and other parts of the body, demanding