CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0516DEC006291200
16 mai 2002
He could have also filed a civil action for damages.
Page 76 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0207JUD005317699
7 février 2002
The Court accepts that the applicant suffered damage of a non-pecuniary nature as a result of the length of the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD001638105
27 avril 2010
Damage 69. The applicant claimed 100,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 70.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000159806
17 janvier 2012
Although, as a rule, cohabitation may be a requirement for such a relationship, exceptionally other factors may also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD001714218
13 octobre 2020
Damage 54. The applicant claimed 10,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 55. The Government submitted that the claims were excessive. 56.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD007166011
26 février 2015
Throughout the period of his detention he had been under constant medical supervision.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002376394
8 juillet 1999
This is without prejudice to the rights of individuals to claim reparation from the State for damage which they have been caused without justification.” 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209JUD001956311
9 décembre 2014
Chief Constable of the Police Service Northern Ireland [2007] UKHL 14). 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319JUD002724395
19 mars 2002
She also said that their house had been kept under constant police surveillance. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD007443311
13 juillet 2021
The applicant submitted that in light of the Court’s constant case-law both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD003180617
15 avril 2021
was therefore not unreasonable on the part of the authorities to consider that, for the sake of ensuring prison security, he should be subject to tighter security controls, involving increased and constant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD002249293
28 mars 2000
The authorities shall be liable to make reparation for all damage caused by their acts or measures.”
Cour d'Appel
6253c9fbbd3db21cbdd89b8c
17 décembre 2007
DE MIVOISIN prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège Chateau de Mivoisin 45230 DAMMARIE SUR LOING représentée par la SCP LAVAL-LUEGER, avoués à la Cour
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1868014-1972709
14 décembre 2006
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant 25,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 100 for costs and expenses.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115427
22 novembre 2012
It appears that on 6 September 2007 a forensic medical expert examined the applicant and documented his injuries noting that they had not caused any damage to his health. [1] On 17 January
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528DEC004603117
28 mai 2020
location Other complaints under well-established case-law Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12432
9 avril 2019
Indeed, although there was no biological link between them, the child had remained in the first applicant’s constant care from the age of eight months for the first nine years of his life.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD000505817
8 février 2018
date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2176193-2313650
13 novembre 2007
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court, by 13 votes to four, made awards of 4,000 euros (EUR) each in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 10,000 jointly in respect
ECLI:CEDH:002-1015
29 mars 2010
Furthermore, it had not been shown that there was any constant practice on the part of the States capable of establishing the existence of a principle of customary international law generally authorising