CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 348 résultats pour « Constance DAMAMME »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0516DEC006291200

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2002

16 mai 2002

He could have also filed a civil action for damages.

Source officielle

Page 76 sur 118

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0207JUD005317699

Admin. suprême

7 février 2002

7 février 2002

    The Court accepts that the applicant suffered damage of a non-pecuniary nature as a result of the length of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD001638105

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

    Damage 69.     The applicant claimed 100,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 70.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000159806

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

Although, as a rule, cohabitation may be a requirement for such a relationship, exceptionally other factors may also serve to demonstrate that a relationship has sufficient constancy to create de facto

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD001714218

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2020

13 octobre 2020

Damage 54.     The applicant claimed 10,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 55.     The Government submitted that the claims were excessive. 56.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD007166011

Admin. suprême

26 février 2015

26 février 2015

Throughout the period of his detention he had been under constant medical supervision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002376394

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1999

8 juillet 1999

This is without prejudice to the rights of individuals to claim reparation from the State for damage which they have been caused without justification.” 61.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209JUD001956311

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

  Chief Constable of the Police Service Northern Ireland [2007] UKHL   14). 39 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319JUD002724395

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2002

19 mars 2002

She also said that their house had been kept under constant police surveillance. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD007443311

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2021

13 juillet 2021

    The applicant submitted that in light of the Court’s constant case-law both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD003180617

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2021

15 avril 2021

was therefore not unreasonable on the part of the authorities to consider that, for the sake of ensuring prison security, he should be subject to tighter security controls, involving increased and constant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328JUD002249293

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

The authorities shall be liable to make reparation for all damage caused by their acts or measures.”

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253c9fbbd3db21cbdd89b8c

Appel

17 décembre 2007

17 décembre 2007

DE MIVOISIN prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège Chateau de Mivoisin 45230 DAMMARIE SUR LOING représentée par la SCP LAVAL-LUEGER, avoués à la Cour

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1868014-1972709

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2006

14 décembre 2006

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant 25,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 100 for costs and expenses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115427

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2012

22 novembre 2012

It appears that on 6   September 2007 a forensic medical expert examined the applicant and documented his injuries noting that they had not caused any damage to his health. [1] On 17   January

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528DEC004603117

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2020

28 mai 2020

location Other complaints under well-established case-law   Date of receipt of Government’s declaration Date of receipt of applicant’s acceptance Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12432

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

Indeed, although there was no biological link between them, the child had remained in the first applicant’s constant care from the age of eight months for the first nine years of his life.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD000505817

Admin. suprême

8 février 2018

8 février 2018

date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2176193-2313650

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court, by 13 votes to four, made awards of 4,000   euros   (EUR) each in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR   10,000 jointly in respect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1015

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

Furthermore, it had not been shown that there was any constant practice on the part of the States capable of establishing the existence of a principle of customary international law generally authorising

Source officielle