CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202965

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2020

18 mai 2020

He requested to be exempt from both “mandatory military service” ( privalomoji karo tarnyba ) and “alternative national defence service” ( alternatyvioji krašto apsaugos tarnyba ).

Source officielle

Page 76 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225961

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2011

7 avril 2011

The applicants and their friends ignored him, which made both B.H. and V.M. angrier.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2525

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2007

13 septembre 2007

The applicant and the municipality appealed against both judgments. The administrative court of appeal joined the appeals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC002426303

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2009

13 octobre 2009

Both the applicant and the Prosecutor’s Office appealed the decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5597

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2002

17 janvier 2002

Article 2 – The positive obligations incumbent on States require that they make regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients’ lives

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1380508-1441446

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2005

22 juin 2005

  The applicants, both Danish nationals living in Denmark, are Morten Sørensen, who was born in 1975 and lives in Aarhus and Ove Rasmussen, who was born in 1959 and lives in Haderslev.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4376

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2004

18 mai 2004

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – The impossibility for the applicant to obtain the execution of both the March 1997 and October 2000 final judgments until much later constituted an interference with her right

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3128412-3468710

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2010

19 mai 2010

A hearing in both cases took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 8   January 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168609

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2016

18 octobre 2016

On 15   October 2013 he concluded a marriage – both a civil ceremony and, apparently, a Catholic one – with a woman who is serving a long prison sentence at Kalocsa Female Prison for drugging, stabbing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7644

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2013

4 juillet 2013

Russia - 11157/04 and 15162/05 Judgment 4.7.2013 [Section I] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote Automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners’ voting rights: violation   Facts – Both applicants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182992

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2018

26 avril 2018

In both set of proceedings, the applicant asked the Arbitration Board to hold an oral hearing and allow him to comment on the submissions of the Central Referee Board.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11601

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2017

25 juillet 2017

As to the second option – conducting a new investigation and trial – there was no reason to doubt the domestic court’s conclusion that no relevant material concerning the case was available as both the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10688

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2015

17 septembre 2015

accusing deputy mayor of “perversion of justice”: no violation Facts – The applicant was dismissed from his job in a municipal housing office after accusing the deputy mayor of “perversion of justice” both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC000868705

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

Both parties appealed against the judgment. On 17 October 2006 the Maribor Higher Court ( Višje sodišče v Mariboru ) dismissed both appeals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55921

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

Furthermore, the Federal Constitutional Court has had a positive balance in both 1998 and 1999 as the number of cases closed has exceeded the number of new cases brought by 216 and 323 respectively (the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC005207499

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2003

8 juillet 2003

Both parties appealed. On 16 May 2001 the Częstochowa Regional Court ( Sąd Okręgowy ) held a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2479

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2007

11 octobre 2007

Dr X. informed her that histological tests had revealed the existence of cancerous tissue in both breasts, which would have to be surgically removed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13464

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2021

9 novembre 2021

She experienced incidents of bullying both at work and outside of her workplace, caused by colleagues after she had reported five of them for indecent behaviour, leading to disciplinary proceedings and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175891

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

If so, is the same period of time accordingly excluded from the overall six-month time-limit provided for the appellants for lodging both cassation appeals?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210006

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2021

12 avril 2021

his defence were as follows: there had been no written document committing him to stay in the army longer than for ten days; he had neither undergone a medical examination nor taken a military oath, both

Source officielle