CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202965
18 mai 2020
He requested to be exempt from both “mandatory military service” ( privalomoji karo tarnyba ) and “alternative national defence service” ( alternatyvioji krašto apsaugos tarnyba ).
Page 76 sur 1534
ECLI:CEDH:001-225961
7 avril 2011
The applicants and their friends ignored him, which made both B.H. and V.M. angrier.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2525
13 septembre 2007
The applicant and the municipality appealed against both judgments. The administrative court of appeal joined the appeals.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC002426303
13 octobre 2009
Both the applicant and the Prosecutor’s Office appealed the decision.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5597
17 janvier 2002
Article 2 – The positive obligations incumbent on States require that they make regulations compelling both public and private hospitals to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients’ lives
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1380508-1441446
22 juin 2005
The applicants, both Danish nationals living in Denmark, are Morten Sørensen, who was born in 1975 and lives in Aarhus and Ove Rasmussen, who was born in 1959 and lives in Haderslev.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4376
18 mai 2004
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – The impossibility for the applicant to obtain the execution of both the March 1997 and October 2000 final judgments until much later constituted an interference with her right
ECLI:CEDH:003-3128412-3468710
19 mai 2010
A hearing in both cases took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 8 January 2008.
ECLI:CEDH:001-168609
18 octobre 2016
On 15 October 2013 he concluded a marriage – both a civil ceremony and, apparently, a Catholic one – with a woman who is serving a long prison sentence at Kalocsa Female Prison for drugging, stabbing
ECLI:CEDH:002-7644
4 juillet 2013
Russia - 11157/04 and 15162/05 Judgment 4.7.2013 [Section I] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote Automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners’ voting rights: violation Facts – Both applicants
ECLI:CEDH:001-182992
26 avril 2018
In both set of proceedings, the applicant asked the Arbitration Board to hold an oral hearing and allow him to comment on the submissions of the Central Referee Board.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11601
25 juillet 2017
As to the second option – conducting a new investigation and trial – there was no reason to doubt the domestic court’s conclusion that no relevant material concerning the case was available as both the
ECLI:CEDH:002-10688
17 septembre 2015
accusing deputy mayor of “perversion of justice”: no violation Facts – The applicant was dismissed from his job in a municipal housing office after accusing the deputy mayor of “perversion of justice” both
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC000868705
23 juin 2009
Both parties appealed against the judgment. On 17 October 2006 the Maribor Higher Court ( Višje sodišče v Mariboru ) dismissed both appeals.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55921
26 février 2001
Furthermore, the Federal Constitutional Court has had a positive balance in both 1998 and 1999 as the number of cases closed has exceeded the number of new cases brought by 216 and 323 respectively (the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC005207499
8 juillet 2003
Both parties appealed. On 16 May 2001 the Częstochowa Regional Court ( Sąd Okręgowy ) held a hearing.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2479
11 octobre 2007
Dr X. informed her that histological tests had revealed the existence of cancerous tissue in both breasts, which would have to be surgically removed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13464
9 novembre 2021
She experienced incidents of bullying both at work and outside of her workplace, caused by colleagues after she had reported five of them for indecent behaviour, leading to disciplinary proceedings and
ECLI:CEDH:001-175891
6 juillet 2017
If so, is the same period of time accordingly excluded from the overall six-month time-limit provided for the appellants for lodging both cassation appeals?
ECLI:CEDH:001-210006
12 avril 2021
his defence were as follows: there had been no written document committing him to stay in the army longer than for ten days; he had neither undergone a medical examination nor taken a military oath, both