The NIIP did not grant the application immediately because “Budweiser Bier” had already been registered as a appellation of origin on behalf of a Czechoslovak company, Budějovický Budvar.

In April 2003 the General Prosecutor’s Office brought an action on behalf of the State against the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine in the Kyiv Commercial Court, seeking invalidation of the applicant’s Statute

Upon appeal the Court of Cassation quashed the conviction, holding that the applicant had committed an act of extortion by asking for money from business owners – “a grave act” committed on behalf of the

The applicant in the second case also complains that the relevant witnesses on behalf of the defence were not questioned during the proceedings, contrary to Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention.

equality of arms by refusing his requests to produce evidence in his defence, that he was unable to properly examine witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf

He also stated that he had no reason or interest in lodging applications on behalf of dead persons, when he could have lodged the application on behalf of their heirs.

In particular he alleged that the courts had lacked impartiality and that they had disregarded the evidence on his behalf, reached untenable conclusions as to the facts and, as a result, gave wrong decisions

which Mr Beyeler bought in 1977 for 600,000,000 lira, or nearly 310,000 euros (EUR), through an intermediary without, however, disclosing to the vendor that the painting was being purchased on his behalf

letter from Kerrigans, a solicitors firm of Doncaster, South Yorkshire, stating that they had been contacted by the applicant in relation to his case and that they wished to apply for legal aid on his behalf

On 30 September 2002 the applicant, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of his son who was minor at the time, lodged a criminal complaint and a claim for damages with the Cazin Municipal Court (“the

prosecutor replied, stating briefly that the DNA test results submitted by the applicant were not reliable, and she could not file an application for the annulment of his recognition of paternity on his behalf

On 28   November 2014 the applicant was extradited from Belarus and placed in pre-trial detention by a court decision of 1 December 2014 which referred to the nature and the gravity of the imputed

Convention found by the Court in this case concern the insufficient reasoning of the refusal of the Prosecutor before the Court of Cassation to introduce an appeal on points of law on the applicant’s behalf

THE LAW The Court first notes that Mr Sulimanović had died before the application was lodged on behalf of the applicants (the relevant date is set out in the appended table).

(d)   Equality of arms : The NJC had justified its refusal to hear evidence from any of the witnesses called on behalf of the applicant by stating that the circumstances referred to in the evidence

On 16 March 2017 the lawyer who had represented the deceased submitted, on his behalf, a request for reimbursement of lawyer’s fees that had been paid by Z.J.

Russia 18/03/2021 Olga Viktorovna KURKAKHANOVA 1992 Mahilioŭ, Belarus Vanessa KOGAN The applicant is a national of Belarus.

On 24 February 2000, the applicant’s representative made a formal claim for a bereavement tax allowance under section 262 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (“the 1988 Act”) on behalf of the

En ce qui concerne la mission d'assistance à maîtrise d'ouvrage en conduite d'opération relative aux travaux d'amélioration énergétique sur le groupe scolaire de la Benauge : 4.