CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD000347922
25 avril 2024
must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what
Page 75 sur 194
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925JUD003145215
25 septembre 2025
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1010DEC001221386
10 octobre 1988
The Board also decides what specific conditions should be met under the licence.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0117JUD003296796
17 janvier 2002
In those circumstances, the State had compounded its fault by refusing to prosecute the perpetrator of a serious offence.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD007139812
26 juin 2014
and reiterated its calls for their immediate release or transfer to detention centres under State authority.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0812JUD004778409
12 août 2014
What I consider to be critical is that in Scoppola (no. 3) the Court expressed its approval of a specific level of protection above which, therefore, States are not obliged to go, while it did not exclude
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216
2 juin 2020
They considered that the latter had committed abuses by refusing to accompany them, while at the same time preventing them from leaving their home unaccompanied. 21 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD004654499
26 février 2002
Lastly, Ms Sperschneider had spent in all only two hours with the applicants and had shown no interest in what they really thought. 48.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD000454710
13 mars 2012
All the meetings took place while the applicant was separated from P.C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1016JUD003755597
16 octobre 2001
Nor in fact did the applicant cross-examine the arresting officer as to what occurred at the briefing. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130JUD002580194
30 janvier 2001
She made her statement to them as she thought this would get something done about the damage which she had suffered. She wanted the State to vindicate her rights.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0109JUD002176622
9 janvier 2025
The court noted, inter alia , a statement made by the NCA’s representative.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD001924503
9 décembre 2008
However, the company started to experience pressure from different State bodies. 19 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD002712123
8 juillet 2025
A. had been provided with oxygen while in the ambulance and his condition had improved.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1205DEC007120017
5 décembre 2023
The article also quoted the Speaker of the Seimas , I.D., as having stated that under the law, the applicant was entitled to the State annuity and that it was up to the applicant what she did with that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD002442702
11 février 2010
In the meantime, the applicant filed an additional amendment to the statement of claims. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928DEC004916799
28 septembre 1999
The applicants state that this criticism implied that the judge lacked impartiality.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629JUD004593699
29 juin 2006
Bembič, State Attorney-General. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC001436608
5 février 2013
In 2011 he was entitled to full State medical cover since his income was below a certain amount. This benefit is reviewed annually. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC003796315
27 septembre 2016
If the judgment has not been served by expiry of that time ‑ limit, the time ‑ limit shall start to run upon service thereof.”