The Secretariat carried out investigations on the instructions of the Banking Commission, setting disciplinary proceedings in motion where irregularities were found in the administrative checks.

Convention concerning the delayed enforcement of a domestic decision, were communicated to the Albanian Government (“the   Government”), the friendly ‑ settlement procedure being set in motion

Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (see the appended table for the relevant dates), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion

Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (see the appended table for the relevant dates), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion

the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”) (see the appended table for the relevant date), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion

    Having regard to the procedural protection from torture or inhuman treatment, were the domestic authorities under an obligation to initiate an investigation of their own motion, either after

MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern lustration proceedings in which the Fact Verification Commission (“the Commission”), on the basis of documentary evidence that it had obtained on its own motion

the length of prison sentences for offences under section 8 of Law no. 3713 was reduced, the level of fines was increased and courts were required to review previously imposed sentences of their own motion

The Third Specialist Committee, in its opinion of 18 February 2009, concluded that the applicant’s health problems, namely the loss of hearing in the left ear and the limitation of motion in the left leg

  ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION TAKEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE   10 Not necessary for Court to examine complaint of its own motion.

Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (see the appended table for the relevant dates), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion

During the proceedings, the first-instance court examined the applicant’s continued detention at the end of every hearing, either on its own motion or upon the applicant’s request.

ensure the existence of adequate safeguards against arbitrary detention and allow the applicant to initiate judicial review of that detention, including by lodging a request for release, of her own motion

On 10 May 2007 the Municipal Court refused a motion for restitutio in integrum submitted by Ž.S. and Lj.G.

However, in such situations and in accordance with the right of access to court, a member State had, in good faith and on its own motion, to examine other alternative solutions that could remedy the unlawful

Article 5 § 4– The issue to be determined was whether the MHRT’s inability to review with due speed the applicant’s continued detention (of its own motion or on that of the applicant) had complied with

Conclusion : no reason to entertain complaint of its own motion (unanimously). IV.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION A.

The new Criminal Code specifically imposed an obligation on courts which had delivered verdicts convicting and sentencing defendants to revise them of their own motion where a subsequent law reduced the

In his motion, the applicant claimed that he had become aware of those testimonies after the case had been referred to the Regional Court.