CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 603 résultats pour « Lacquit »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207824

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2021

5 janvier 2021

Responding to the lawsuit, the enterprise Amber   Grid pointed out that the first applicant “was not being dismissed because of work-related violations”; rather, he was being dismissed on the basis

Page 75 sur 81

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120700

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2009

22 octobre 2009

they are prevented from enjoying the normal peace and quiet they expect in their private lives or even such that they are caused actual physical harm, should be prohibited; vi. a civil action (private lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928JUD000598903

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2006

28 septembre 2006

Council, although the council at the relevant time already had answered questions regarding her case three times before, even during the period at the administrative level, i.e. before she filed the lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD000206803

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

Accordingly, their lawsuits in the Russian military courts could not be qualified as “civil” and thus were not protected by Article 6. 15.     The applicants contested this argument.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0613JUD001475808

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2013

13 juin 2013

authorities for several years, the applicants cannot be blamed for their decision to withdraw the execution documents from the Federal Treasury Department for the Chechen Republic in order to bring a new lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215445

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2021

15 décembre 2021

Nevertheless, at different points in time between 2015 and 2018 the Russian authorities brought lawsuits against the applicants with a view to claiming their land plots as public property and having their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1129JUD001284987

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1991

29 novembre 1991

be given to the new provisions; in the end concern for the legal certainty to be preserved in the interests of families, third parties and the State, together with the fear that a large number of lawsuits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD003585304

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

    On 13 October 2004 the Vlora District Court informed the Albanian Ombudsperson that no lawsuit had been filed with it relating to the abduction of the applicant’s daughter. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1106DEC005343099

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2001

6 novembre 2001

exorbitant financial demands, inducing people to sever their ties with their home environment, bodily harm, indoctrination of children, more or less antisocial views, prejudicing public order, numerous lawsuits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113DEC003488506

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

administration must apply to the relevant authority for rectification of the situation within a year of the date on which they were notified or otherwise learned of the impugned act, before bringing a lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526JUD000393202

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

    The present case, however, raises different issues, since the prosecutor did not participate in the judicial deliberations; his lawsuit was communicated to the applicant and she used the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0401DEC000465370

Admin. suprême

1 avril 1974

1 avril 1974

present situation also causes prejudice to those who need legal aid, because a barrister appointed to defend the case of a poor party will naturally not put much effort into a difficult and perhaps long lawsuit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD003334303

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

    In the meantime, the applicant filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Environment, as the legal successor of the Azerbmeşe Production Union, arguing that his dismissal had been unlawful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0910DEC001447788

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1992

10 septembre 1992

        The District Court expected numerous lawsuits of the applicant with his wife (challenge of the validity of the marriage and of the legitimate birth of a child, contestation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD007123313

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2017

19 octobre 2017

Federal prosecutors, who opened their case in the wake of a number of private lawsuits challenging the legitimacy of the license award, have been examining documents for nearly a year, and the exact status

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004208398

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2003

16 décembre 2003

In addition, the domestic authorities should be held responsible for the delay in holding the first hearing on 3 February 1995, i.e. three years and two months after the filing of the lawsuit.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0406DEC000313467

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1968

6 avril 1968

It appears that the Federal Constitutional Court has not yet decided on this complaint and that the above lawsuit is also still pending ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108DEC004082515

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2022

8 novembre 2022

    Lastly, the lawsuit brought by the applicant against Mr A personally, concerned the breach of his own honour and reputation which had taken place in the course of and after his argument with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD002596802

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2007

31 juillet 2007

statement critical of administration of State affairs, even in situations where the official was not referred to by name or in an otherwise identifiable manner, journalists would be inundated with lawsuits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD005012306

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

After this incident the Belgrade police submitted a request for the initiation of prosecution proceedings against her, and the Association of Families of the Missing lodged a lawsuit, demanding that she

Source officielle