CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC005764600

Admin. suprême

19 février 2002

19 février 2002

Both will be payable to men and women who meet the relevant qualifying conditions.

Source officielle

Page 75 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179676

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2017

1 décembre 2017

COMPLAINTS Both applicants complain under Article 8 of the Convention that it is impossible for them to freely choose a family name for their children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD003212808

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2022

22 mars 2022

N. drew his service gun and, after making a warning shot, fired at the pair, severely wounding both of them. On 18 July 2001 the applicant’s son died in a hospital as a result of the wounds. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6924

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2000

27 avril 2000

Social welfare officials allegedly told both the applicants and the foster parents that the children’s placement would last for years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150871

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2015

6 janvier 2015

On 8 March 2000 the Supreme Court quashed both lower courts’ decisions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148362

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

the property owners in Toptancılar Sitesi brought an action before the Batman Civil Court of First Instance for the compensation of the damages he had sustained as a result of the explosion, against both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1204DEC006052500

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2001

4 décembre 2001

Both will be payable to men and women who meet the relevant qualifying conditions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14483

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2025

26 juin 2025

That case-law showed the effectiveness both of the remedy provided for in Article   L.   141-1 of the Code of Judicial Organisation, and of the domestic courts’ reviews.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0921DEC003743797

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 1999

21 septembre 1999

The court considered that both spouses had been at fault in respect of the breakdown of their marriage.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C210409

Cassation

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

l'expert A..., après avoir constaté l'absence de méthode de datation officielle et incontestable, a procédé à l'audition de nombreux sachants (responsable de l'ONF, responsables de jardins exotiques ou botaniques

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0916DEC004000904

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2008

16 septembre 2008

On 31 October 2007 the Regional Court authorised both parties to make further written submissions by 14 December 2007.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118286

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2013

7 mars 2013

  In both cases, the European Court found that the domestic courts had not properly examined the applicants’ pleas of entrapment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212JUD001097012

Admin. suprême

12 février 2019

12 février 2019

Both applicants had been awarded reasonable compensation and thus their rights had been fully restored at the national level. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0419DEC003421014

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2018

19 avril 2018

    In the applicant’s view, both sets of proceedings had pursued the same purpose and had addressed the same aspect of unlawful conduct.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-118127

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2013

7 mars 2013

  In both cases, the European Court found that the domestic courts had not properly examined the applicants’ pleas of entrapment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD002652119

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2024

18 juillet 2024

Navalnyy   Syktyvkar 23/01/2021 (both applicants)                 Rally in support of A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3502752-3948869

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2011

26 avril 2011

The applicants and their friends ignored him, which made both B.H. and V.M. angrier.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0306DEC003959898

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2003

6 mars 2003

    He also complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of both sets of proceedings. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230563

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

in respect of the event of 10/08/2019 had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0416DEC003211096

Admin. suprême

16 avril 1998

16 avril 1998

  As from that date both accused were remanded in custody pursuant to a decision of the Banská Bystrica Regional Court (Krajsky súd) of 20 May 1993.

Source officielle