He explained that T.G.S. had denied him the possibility to maintain contact with his son and that the situation had worsened because of the legal disputes between them.

According to the court’s reasoning the applicant had neglected his professional obligations because he had not verified the veracity of the information that the job had been offered to M.C.’s daughter.

    In the present case, although the alleged defamation had taken place in 2003, the domestic courts applied the Criminal Code 2005 because its provisions were more lenient for the defendant

This preliminary investigation stage or pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings might be of importance for civil proceedings, both because of the decisive impact the outcome of the criminal proceedings

The court accordingly concluded that there was no cause to continue with the criminal proceedings because there was no longer any offence. The judgment became final on 11 January 1997.

  Since the applicants had failed to take these precautions they had not followed the safest route but had chosen a part of the slope which because of its weather and snow conditions had been at a

He further asked the court to give him more time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, because since the applicant’s arrest he was authorised to meet him only once.

The complaint was sent out by the post office on 18 October 2010, because it was submitted after the last dispatch on 16 October and because the 17 October was a non-working day.

Lastly, the applicant also complains under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention that in the proceedings before the Zagreb County Court he could not have defended himself in person because he had not been

    In his application to the Court the applicant claims that in his case the prosecution became time-barred because the transactions at issue took place in February 2008 and he was summoned

Yet it had been his nephew, K.S., who had killed Imran Gisayev because his second son had died in 1995. In his view the killing had been just as part of a blood feud.

the word “machinations” had not been used in Mr   Ponomaryov’s written and oral statements and because the applicant company had failed to prove that such machinations had taken place.

The Court notes that the applicant never claimed that his transfer was ordered because of his trade union activities.

It appears that 10   hearings were cancelled either because the police had not brought the detained accused from prison or because some of the applicant's released co-defendants had not appeared before

The first hearing in the applicant’s case, listed by the Popovo District Court for 17 December 2001, was adjourned because the applicant and several witnesses, despite being duly summoned, were absent.

    On 21 July 2004 the Regional Court dismissed the applicant's motion for bias, lodged because of the extreme protraction of the proceedings.

Subsequently, the applicant could not meet with the child because her mother repeatedly objected to any such meetings. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT 4.

.- Par une requête n°2405158 et des pièces, enregistrées les 28 mai, 12, 13 et 14 juin 2024, Mme B A épouse C, représentée par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide

The at had not been immediately available because there had been no funding. A bailiff had several times fined the applicant’s commander for the non-enforcement.

This preliminary investigation stage or pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings might be of importance for civil proceedings, both because of the decisive impact the outcome of the criminal proceedings