The applicant alleged, in particular, that his brother had died as a result of torture by Government agents and that the investigation into his death had not met the applicable standards.

The applicant also alleged, without explanation, that she had had no opportunity to change her clothes throughout her detention. Unlike other patients, no outdoor strolls had been allowed to her.

    The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment and the alleged lack of an effective investigation. It raises issues under Article 3 of the Convention. 2 .

. - The judgment has also been discussed in Halsburys Laws of England Constitutional Law and Human Rights as well as in Criminal Proceedings: Breach of “Reasonable Time Requirement” - Need for Alleged

In July 2006 the newspaper Özgür Gündem published an alleged confession in which a former agent of the JİTEM (the anti-terror intelligence branch of the gendarmerie) described the abduction and killing

The judge considered that the application of a fixed penalty to the applicant was "most unfair", because if he had not alerted the authorities to the fact that someone had tampered with the cord which

It was alleged that, the day before, after consuming a large quantity of alcohol, the applicant had argued with his girlfriend, with whom he lived at the time.

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that he had been denied access to court to challenge the decisions of the authorities.

Turkey - 23818/94 Judgment 28.7.1998 Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Effective investigation Alleged unlawful killing by security forces, planning and conduct of their operation and alleged

Both applicants complain of the lack of effective investigation into their alleged ill-treatment.

The District Governor asked the Ovacık Gendarmerie Headquarters for information about the alleged incident.

The District Governor requested the Ovacık Gendarmerie Headquarters to provide information about the alleged incident.

Charles M..., Henri F..., Alfred V..., David Z..., Jeanine Y..., Elie N..., Christian C..., Raphaël T... et au ministre des départements et territoires d'outre-mer.

Alfred X..., membre suppléant du comité d'entreprise ; que par décision du 11 octobre 1983 l'inspecteur du travail de la 2ème section de l'Aisne a refusé l'autorisation de licencier M.

Vu la requête, enregistrée le 17 mars 2008 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par le SYNDICAT NATIONAL DES OSTEOPATHES DE FRANCE, domicilié 14, avenue Alfred de Vigny, Les Floralies

[D] [Z] [Y], [Adresse 3] comparant par Me Alfred FITOUSSI [Adresse 4] [Courriel 1] Délibéré par : Président : M. Jean-Luc GAILHAC Juges : Mme Joëlle MANDEL M.

(ALFRED), CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE BORDEAUX EN DATE DU 23 MARS 1966, QUI LES A CONDAMNES : 1° X..., A 1000 FRANCS D'AMENDE POUR : A INFRACTION AUX ARTICLES 31, PARAGRAPHE 2 DE LA LOI DU 24

Madame [H] [B] née le 16 Août 1988 à RAS JEBEL (TUNISIE) 7, Avenue Alexandre Dumas Résidence Ivory Square - Bât A 13008 MARSEILLE comparante en personne c/ DEFENDERESSE Organisme POLE EMPLOI 34, RUE ALFRED