the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Azerbaijani national, Mr Sarvan Samad

) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Kazakhstani national, Mr Samat

does not consider that it can conclude that a case no longer has a valid legal interest for the applicant on the ground that there have been changes in domestic legislation since the material time (see Sadak

obligation to adopt positive measures to “organise” democratic elections “under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (see Yumak and Sadak

#xa0; Mustafa YAĞCI Supreme Administrative Court E:2007-1697             22438/07 22/05/2007 Tacettin TURAN 03/02/1974 Erzurum   Rehşan BATARAY SAMAN

        Á félagssvædi, par sem takmörkun er í gildi, skulu       bifreidastjórar í sömu grein vera í sama stéttarfélagi.

;   on sovitettava sellaiseksi, että se vastaa jäsenkuntien       valtuustoissa edustettuina olevien eri ryhmien       kunnallisvaaleissa saamaa

  En förutsättning är att verksamheten bedrivs på samma ort och att läkaren under tiden juli 1983 - mars 1984 har bedrivit verksamheten i sådan omfattning att han fått ersättning från den allmänna

Section 1 of the Act reads as follows:   (Swedish)   "Sådan församlingsskatt enligt lagen (1961:436) om församlingsstyrelse, som efter kyrkofullmäktiges beslut eller eljest debiteras efter samma

applicant it had taken into account its own practice in other similar cases, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, the “social circumstances” in Serbia itself, and the “very essence” ( sama