CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD001046517
28 janvier 2020
The applicant, however, had pulled away, spat on R.M., told him that he was not afraid of him and swung by his right arm against R.M., who had consequently had to grasp and hit him.
Page 74 sur 101
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919JUD006664110
19 septembre 2017
By 18 December 2013 three hearings had been held, during which one expert witness was heard, and a number of other pieces of documentary evidence were read out, such as an earlier statement of another
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC003969118
22 mars 2022
Captain P.A. was informed that projectiles were landing 500 metres away from the position. 68.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827JUD001502816
27 août 2024
In addition, a committee had been set up to verify his submissions and its members had also become aware of the content of the report.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD002706505
2 décembre 2010
When they were about 100 metres away from their house, Adam Dadayev returned to the house to let the cattle out.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD000209113
11 juillet 2017
investigation V. denied the allegations and submitted that she had been a victim of domestic violence, that she had been threatened and beaten by the applicant, and that this had prompted her to run away
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC003519918
18 mai 2021
of criticism or in the exercise of official duty, in a piece of journalism, in the course of political or other social activity, or in the defence of a right or protection of justified benefits shall
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0625JUD002424494
25 juin 2002
He was not under such an obligation, but he had to be aware that his failure to do so had further prolonged the proceedings. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127JUD007379701
27 janvier 2004
Applicant: I saw with my own eyes the small pieces of paper going from one judge to an other when I was cross-examining, in a way not very flattering to the defence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917JUD007546010
17 septembre 2019
by the police and signed by the applicant and İ.A., the police searched the applicant’s flat and found the following items; a book with the title Twenty-first Century Women Freedom Manifesto , five pieces
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004323198
13 novembre 2003
Then the three men threw Mr E.S.A. out of the vehicle, kicked him several times while he was lying on the ground, and drove away with the jeep.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0725JUD000158615
25 juillet 2019
On 30 November 2011, after the applicant’s lawyer had become aware that there had been much more telecommunication surveillance than what had been prepared as transcripts and put into the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD006575501
22 mai 2008
The Court is well aware that elaborate reasoning may prove hard to achieve in urgent situations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD002010006
25 février 2010
The perpetrators, who were armed, forced the driver of the bank vehicle to abandon it, took the money and drove away from the scene in the bank's vehicle.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0429JUD003631797
29 avril 1998
It originated in an application (no. 36317/97) against the French Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by a French national, Mr Pierre Leterme, on 21 May 1997.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113358
7 septembre 2012
Thereafter the father went [away] and I asked the child [the same question].
ECLI:CEDH:001-147951
15 octobre 2014
Yazdani of Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors, Mr R. Husain QC of Matrix Chambers, and Ms L. Dubinsky of Doughty Street Chambers. A. The circumstances of the case 1.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1170516-1214828
28 octobre 2004
Furthermore, the Court recalled that the Supreme Administrative Court’s decision contravened the principle of legal certainty, as the applicant could not have been aware that a decision had been given
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001899191
13 octobre 1993
On the one hand the Senate had already two valuations at its disposal; on the other, the applicant had already had sufficient time to submit a private valuation since he had been aware of the first instance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609DEC000260611
9 juin 2020
The Government stated that Sh. had not issued any expert report in relation to the charge against the applicant and thus could not be legitimately interviewed in relation to any such piece of evidence;