;   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, Fifth Appeal Court 10/06/2021 21/10/2019 10/06/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

In general, the Supreme Court conducts a public hearing on the plea of nullity, which may be combined with a hearing on appeals against sentence.

He gave no details concerning the need for a public hearing. 8.

The hearing of 4 February 2003 did not take place due to the respondent’s illness. 8.

    On 22 November 1993 the court held a hearing. 9.     Subsequently, hearings were held on 21 February, 31   May and 29   September 1994.

The applicant did not request a hearing.

On the whole, 22 hearings were held until 1 May 1993. In 1993 further hearings were held on 17 August, 16 September, 2   November and 2 December.

and of the same situation continuing during the hearings.

       The Government further submit that the applicant has waived his right to a public hearing because she had not requested an oral hearing before the administrative authorities

The court decided to postpone the hearing until September.

The next hearing was held on 3 June 1997. Hearings to be held on 16   September and 18 November 1997 were adjourned. In 1998 hearings were held on 13 January, 17 March and 26 May.

He wished to know, in particular, the date of the first hearing.

He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) .   Canan v.

He relies on Article 2 (right to life) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Pilčić v.

They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Katrami v.

However, the hearing was adjourned on the grounds of the sickness of one of his co-accused.

On 1 March 2010 the applicants submitted a written request to the Administrative Court asking for a public oral hearing of their claim.

An oral hearing shall take place at the request of an individual party to the case, if such a hearing is not unnecessary and there are no particular reasons against it.

The applicant claimed that he had been unaware of the date and time of the hearing of 9 March 2014 and of the judgment delivered in that hearing.

A Grand Chamber hearing took place in the Human Rights building in Strasbourg on 16 November 2005.