CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD003054204
7 juillet 2009
Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Sadak and Others v
Page 73 sur 74
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD000450806
26 juillet 2011
Greece , 1 July 1997, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey [GC], no. 10226/03, § 109 (iii), 8 July 2008). 42.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0719JUD002617107
19 juillet 2012
Finland , no. 30542/04, § 41, 7 July 2009 and Sadak and Others v. Turkey , nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001 ‑ VIII). 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD004015607
28 septembre 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD000851311
5 décembre 2019
that the means employed are not disproportionate or arbitrary (see Davydov and Others , cited above, § 272; see also Paksas , cited above, § 96-97; Tănase , cited above, §§ 161-62; and Dicle and Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006827314
30 octobre 2018
Norway (19 February 1996, §§ 52-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ I), and Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no. 1) (nos.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506
25 septembre 2014
context of another, at least so long as the chosen system provides for conditions which will ensure the “free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (see Yumak and Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324JUD003126906
24 mars 2015
does not consider that it can conclude that a case no longer has a valid legal interest for the applicant on the ground that there have been changes in domestic legislation since the material time (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD003804818
16 novembre 2021
Romania (cited above) for the purpose of Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Sadak v. Turkey , nos. 25142/94 and 27099/95, §§ 32-33, 8 April 2004). 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD005506600
11 janvier 2007
such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD004168306
24 mai 2016
the concern to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of an electoral procedure aimed at identifying the will of the people through universal suffrage (see Hirst , cited above, § 62, and Yumak and Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD004443806
21 juillet 2011
Article 6 § 1 taken together with 6 § 3 also requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD006078519
18 octobre 2022
In March 2017 the applicant gave various interviews to an online newspaper and other media, stating amongst other things that he had been on the front line in the village of Tal Saman about
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD003378004
17 février 2011
Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner” (see Sadak and Others
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD006180008
19 février 2013
that paragraph 1 of Article 6 taken together with paragraph 3 requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see, Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619JUD002150802
19 juin 2007
of Article 6 taken together with paragraph 3 requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see, Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0424JUD000141305
24 avril 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD004364304
27 avril 2010
of Article 6, taken together with paragraph 3, requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD004254118
11 janvier 2024
opinion flowing through a country’s population, political parties make an irreplaceable contribution to the political debate which is at the very core of the concept of a democratic society (see Yumak and Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1031JUD001231607
31 octobre 2013
In such circumstances, his failure to specify the compensation claim cannot be regarded as an unequivocal waiver of the right to have the claim decided on the merits (see, mutatis mutandis , Sadak and