CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 472 résultats pour « Samak »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD003054204

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Sadak and Others v

Page 73 sur 74

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD000450806

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2011

26 juillet 2011

Greece , 1 July 1997, §   39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Yumak and Sadak   v. Turkey [GC], no. 10226/03, § 109 (iii), 8 July 2008). 42.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0719JUD002617107

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2012

19 juillet 2012

  Finland , no. 30542/04, §   41, 7 July 2009 and Sadak and Others v. Turkey , nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001 ‑ VIII). 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD004015607

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Sadak and Others v

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD000851311

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2019

5 décembre 2019

that the means employed are not disproportionate or arbitrary (see Davydov and   Others , cited above, § 272; see also Paksas , cited above, § 96-97; Tănase , cited above, §§ 161-62; and Dicle and Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006827314

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2018

30 octobre 2018

Norway (19 February 1996, §§ 52-54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ I), and Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no.   1) (nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0925JUD001253506

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2014

25 septembre 2014

context of another, at least so long as the chosen system provides for conditions which will ensure the “free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (see Yumak and Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324JUD003126906

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2015

24 mars 2015

does not consider that it can conclude that a case no longer has a valid legal interest for the applicant on the ground that there have been changes in domestic legislation since the material time (see Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD003804818

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2021

16 novembre 2021

  Romania (cited above) for the purpose of Article 35 § 2 (b) of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Sadak v. Turkey , nos. 25142/94 and 27099/95, §§ 32-33, 8   April 2004). 46.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD005506600

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate (see Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD004168306

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

the concern to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of an electoral procedure aimed at identifying the will of the people through universal suffrage (see Hirst , cited above, § 62, and Yumak and Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD004443806

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2011

21 juillet 2011

    Article 6 § 1 taken together with 6 § 3 also requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD006078519

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

    In March 2017 the applicant gave various interviews to an online newspaper and other media, stating amongst other things that he had been on the front line in the village of Tal Saman about

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0217JUD003378004

Admin. suprême

17 février 2011

17 février 2011

Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner” (see Sadak and Others

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD006180008

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

that paragraph 1 of Article 6 taken together with paragraph 3 requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see, Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619JUD002150802

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2007

19 juin 2007

of Article   6 taken together with paragraph   3 requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see, Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0424JUD000141305

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2012

24 avril 2012

Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Sadak and Others v

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427JUD004364304

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2010

27 avril 2010

of Article   6, taken together with paragraph   3, requires the Contracting States to take positive steps so as to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD004254118

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

opinion flowing through a country’s population, political parties make an irreplaceable contribution to the political debate which is at the very core of the concept of a democratic society (see Yumak and Sadak

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1031JUD001231607

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2013

31 octobre 2013

In such circumstances, his failure to specify the compensation claim cannot be regarded as an unequivocal waiver of the right to have the claim decided on the merits (see, mutatis mutandis , Sadak and

Source officielle