On 27 November 1996 Parliament held a debate on the motion to repeal section 209 of the Criminal Code.

On 27   January 2000 the applicant challenged the judge rapporteur, a motion which was dismissed on 15   February 2000.

  He contends that the Assize Court failed to take additional evidence of his own motion.

    According to the applicant, the head of the Office for Agriculture ( Amt für Landwirtschaft ) gave him assurances as to the compensatory plots to be expected before he signed the motion of

On 27 November 1996 Parliament held a debate on the motion to repeal section 209 of the Criminal Code.

In the context of procedural disputes concerning the applicants' motion to hear certain witnesses, their obligation to pay outstanding stamp duties, as well as questions of legal aid, on 2   November

He claimed that this constituted a ground of nullity which the appellate court had to examine of its own motion.

Moreover, in November 2004 the Supreme Court dismissed the Company’s motion which had been filed with a view to having it declared that the proceedings were to be regarded as ‘interrupted’ ( félbeszakadt

    Consequently, on 31 March 2022 the Zagreb County Court, of its own motion, terminated the applicant’s serving of his prison sentence and placed him in pre-trial detention until his conviction

    In 1990 the military prosecutor’s office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice opened investigations of its own motion into the injury of Mr Butucan and the deaths of the other

Le manquement à cette obligation d'inter-motion, d'ordre public, est sanctionné par l'inopposabilité à l'employeur de la décision prise par la caisse.

Le comité d'établissement de [Localité 2] a voté, au cours de sa réunion du 9 décembre 2010, deux motions': - une motion n°1, relative au désaccord avec la direction sur le montant de la masse salariale

The applicant did not file a motion to be granted leave to appeal on points of law against that judgment.

    In May 2013 the applicant challenged a judge and lodged further procedural motions. 22.

In the meantime the applicants filed a supervisory appeal, motions for a change of venue and for judges involved in the case to stand down.

On 17 November 2004, the Mühlhausen Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s motion to terminate the proceedings because of the length of the proceedings.

    In response to the applicant’s motion for bias, the Supreme Court appointed the Mezőkövesd District Court to hear the case.

The proceedings had been prolonged to a certain extent due to the parties’ procedural motions, which was not imputable to the domestic courts.

    Apart from the above –mentioned objection filed by the applicant, there have been seven occasions where the Assize Court reviewed the applicant’s continued detention on its own motion.

On 31 October 2008 the Deputy Prosecutor of Kazan acknowledged of his own motion unlawfulness of the investigator’s decision of 14 July 2008 and sent the case for review to the Head of the Central Interdistrict