Monsieur [M] [D] Madame [E] [D] c/ Madame [W] [V] Nature de la décision : AU FOND Grosse délivrée le : à : Me Laure LABARRIERE, avocat au barreau de LIBOURNE

la décision : AU FOND Grosse délivrée le : aux avocats Décision déférée à la cour : jugement rendu le 12 novembre 2020 (R.G. 17/00546) par le Tribunal judiciaire de LIBOURNE

avoués à la Cour assistée de Me Cyril CAZCARRA, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX Appelante d'un jugement rendu le 19 décembre 2003 par le Juge de l'Exécution près le Tribunal de Grande Instance de LIBOURNE

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

His overall deprivation of liberty included the following periods. 8.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation

of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)

);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation)

    The applicant contended that there were no arguments in favour of his deprivation of liberty and that his remand in custody had not been based on relevant and sufficient reasons. 33.

Its key purpose is to prevent arbitrary or unjustified deprivations of liberty (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 84, ECHR   2016 (extracts), with further references). 8

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no.

    Was the applicants’ deprivation of liberty ordered “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law” for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Steel and Others v. the United