It was apparent from the case file that the applicants' parents had given their consent to their child's placement in a special school or had even expressly requested it.

He had admitted that he had been a member of the “PFLP” since 1975.

They had driven to 7 Leo Street, where the body had been handed over to an ambulance.

However, that officer had already left and he had turned to go back to the office when he had heard a shot. [K.S.] had run out.

and had to confirm that the accident had been real. 13.

The applicant reiterated that he had not stabbed N. and had had no intention of murdering him. He had used the knife to cut paintings out of their frames.

Another officer had then ordered him to stand up and when he had done so, the officer had kicked him in the chest so that he had fallen back onto the chair.

) who had not had much in common with the issues raised in the article.

G.P. submitted that he had not forced the applicant to have sexual intercourse with him and that he had only slapped her because she had provoked him.

had not been truly “heard”.

had had to compile the report than to the content of the report itself.

It had been distributed to educators for further dissemination among their students and had been made available for download from the regional Government’s website.

As regards counts 1 and 2 the Supreme Court had found unanimously that the applicant had provided guidance as well as procured medications, by specific acts, for A and B, in the knowledge that they had

The accused had died before his guilt had been lawfully established by a “tribunal”, so prior to his death he had been presumed innocent.

They had to be regarded as public figures.

By not doing so, the authorities had taken a foreseeable risk, given that R.K. had been married to the applicant and thus had a right to refuse to testify under domestic law – an eventuality which had

Law – Article 2 ( substantive aspect ) (a)     Whether the use of lethal force had been “absolutely necessary” – The gendarme G.Y., who had fired the fatal shot and who had not been involved

In the first place the Court noted that the Modrow Law had been passed by a parliament that had not been democratically elected, during a transitional period between two regimes that had inevitably been

They claimed, in particular, that they had been living in a temporary municipal accommodation for seventeen years, had paid charges for it and had taken care of it.