NOVEMBRE 2025 La société Hiscox SA Niederlassung für Deutschland, dont le siège est [Adresse 2] (Allemagne), succursale indépendante de la société Hiscox SA, dont le siège est [Adresse 1] (Grand-Duché

ROSA-SCHALL, en application des articles 805 et 907 du code de procédure civile et à défaut d'opposition a tenu l'audience pour entendre les plaidoiries et en a rendu compte à la Cour composée de : Madame DUCHAC

Régis Godrie, demeurant Domaine de Brunet Loctoucau, 33600 Pessac, 10°/ de Mme Odette Duchat, demeurant Résidence Hélianthe, Carrefour d'Hélianthe, 64200 Biarritz, 11°/ de M.

to the report drawn up on 16 April 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 10   November 1994 by a Dutch

then arose as to whether the applicants were entitled to an award under Rule   43 §   4 of the Rules of Court* in respect of costs incurred in translating their submissions to the Court from Dutch

The applicant complains under Article 13 that he did not have an effective remedy in Dutch national law in terms of his complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning her expulsion to Eritrea were communicated to the Dutch Government (“the Government”).

Seeds, filiale de la Royal Dutch ; que, dans ces conditions, en estimant que M.

the appeal stage, at the request of the Public Prosecution Service, of criminal proceedings against a group of persons suspected of the highly violent assault on the applicant were communicated to the Dutch

Applicant’s Name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1 Fausto SCHERMI 17/09/1956 Italian Fano 2 Elwin Anthony VAN DIJK 18/11/1960 Dutch Fano    

Chamber composed as follows:   Elisabeth Palm (Swedish), President , Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Riza Türmen (Turkish), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romanian), Willi Fuhrmann (Austrian), Wilhelmina Thomassen (Dutch

Nationality Place of residence Represented by 1 48981/17 05/07/2017 Nella ARAMBAŠIN 17/10/1961 Croatian and French Paris Nikola DORBIĆ 2 49727/17 05/07/2017 Marina ARAMBAŠIN 15/07/1959 Croatian, French and Dutch

The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B. Koopman, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The applicant complained under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention.

In the case of Eugenia and Doina Duca v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Alvina

Dans la procédure devant la cour d’appel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg le requérant était représenté par Maître Dean Spielmann.

          That same day the lawyer was denied access to the applicant by Order of the Public Prosecutor, who based himself on Section 50 para. 2 of the Dutch Code

    The applicant is a Dutch citizen, born in 1949 and residing in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.   6.

In the case of Dushka v.

    The applicants, Eveline Camp and Sofian Bourimi, are Dutch citizens, born in 1966 and 1992 respectively, and resident in Weert, the Netherlands.