CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002385894
9 avril 1997
They state that the final two year delay, concerning the petition for leave to appeal to the House of Lords, was largely the responsibility of the applicant.
Page 73 sur 868
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002550794
2 juillet 1997
Although the applicant is solely responsible for this delay, the Dutch courts allowed him some clemency for the passage of time between the commission of the offences and the applicant's conviction.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701REP002550794
1 juillet 1998
The Commission notes in particular two delays imputable to the State.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC002590394
30 novembre 1999
He also submits that the extensive exchange of files had not been necessary, and in any event had not caused any delays.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC007225301
30 novembre 2004
Otherwise the driving licence is to be restored to the person concerned without delay.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD002243102
8 novembre 2005
They submitted that some periods of delay in the proceedings had been attributable to the applicant (see paragraph 20 above) and that this had caused general delay of about a year.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0203JUD003704002
3 février 2005
There were no delays to be attributed to the Austrian authorities, while the applicants caused some delay, in that they complied only in January 2002 with the Mayor’s request of June 2001 to submit amended
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1940163-2045026
6 mars 2007
formalities, reiterating that those formalities could not justify a delay of more than a few hours.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327DEC006089008
27 mars 2018
Nor does such a delay affect the admissibility of the application where the applicant was in a particularly vulnerable situation, having regard to the complexity of the case and the nature of the alleged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1014DEC001882491
14 octobre 1992
He stated that the delay in diagnosis however probably did not affect the final course of the disease, which had responded well to radiotherapy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0207JUD002349003
7 février 2008
The Government submitted that on 15 August 2005 the applicant had been awarded the compensation for the delay in the enforcement of the judgment of 11 September 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1119DEC003881197
19 novembre 2002
Proceedings concerning the delay in surrendering possession of a plot of land against the Szczuczyn Agricultural Co-operative 1.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1835467-1925972
9 novembre 2006
The Court saw no reasonable explanation for such long delays in a situation where prompt action was vital.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107JUD001061503
7 novembre 2006
This, however, only accounted for a delay of some two months. There was also a short delay of four months when the parties were unable to agree a date for the hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228REP002183693
28 février 1996
Also considerable delays had to be attributed to the court experts. 38.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307JUD005450308
7 mars 2019
domestic law for the complaint of inadequate medical treatment in prison 9,750 54570/16 19/09/2016 Ivan Sergiyovych Zhukov 11/07/1984 [3] Vasyl Ivanovych Melnychuk Kyiv Kidney disease delay
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213JUD003255103
13 décembre 2005
The Government also stated that the Bailiffs performed all necessary actions to enforce the judgments and could not be held liable for any delay.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109JUD001737820
9 novembre 2023
He had two expert reports produced on his behalf, which concluded that his state of health was incompatible with detention and reported significant delays in the provision of a CPAP machine (a ventilator
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD000756808
18 juillet 2024
Neither did the Government submit any other explanation for the delays. Proceedings related to the challenge of the applicant’s title 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC002938811
15 octobre 2013
“reasonable”; (c) a reduction to be determined on a case-to-case basis if the delay had been longer than that. 12.