CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604JUD004899814
4 juin 2024
Varyan] had not been subjected to constant abuse by co-servicemen and his direct commander ... (10) the relevant officials had investigated in a timely manner the fact of [T.
Page 73 sur 118
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0228DEC002949205
28 février 2008
The damage caused by this crime, as the investigation has revealed, amounted to several million roubles.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001JUD003849404
1 octobre 2013
Damage 83. The applicant claimed 19,211,910 euros (EUR), representing the loss of his clientele and company and the damage caused to his reputation. 84.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0830JUD000951181
30 août 1990
Chief Constable of Merseyside (1985), The Times Law Reports, 1 August 1985).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1663
12 février 2009
The conditions of his overnight stay in the transit hall (in a locked room under constant supervision) were equivalent in practice to a deprivation of liberty, for which the Russian authorities were responsible
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2366288-2537510
29 mai 2008
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court awarded the applicants, jointly, 70,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 5,000 for costs and
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1013DEC001179785
13 octobre 1986
It appears that a civil action for damages, which had been suspended pending the administrative court proceedings, was likewise to no avail.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-176163
12 juillet 2017
According to the applicant, from the outset her marriage was ruined by constant scandals and fights with P. On 4 October 2011 the applicant divorced P.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD001953223
4 juillet 2024
Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001759290
13 octobre 1993
xa0; The Provincial Board submitted observations in reply arguing inter alia, that there was no proof for the applicant's allegation that the provisional transfer caused them damages
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD002741417
20 septembre 2018
date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0329JUD001220415
29 mars 2018
name Date of birth Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD002723121
10 novembre 2022
introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage
ECLI:CEDH:003-2589748-2812545
18 décembre 2008
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicants 7,000 euros (EUR), each, in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and EUR 1,050 to Oleg Kats for costs and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD006206808
2 mai 2017
In his application of 26 May 2006 he also asked the court to index ‑ link the delayed payments and claimed non-pecuniary damage for the delayed enforcement of the judgment of 29 March 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD002287210
4 mai 2017
Applicant name Date of birth Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917DEC002948106
17 septembre 2009
Government therefore suggest that the ECHR take this information as a reason to strike the present application off the register pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention in accordance with its constant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627DEC004901799
27 juin 2002
Did the Chief Constable know about the taxi driver’s statement, when he made this statement?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523JUD004964509
23 mai 2017
The court further dismissed the applicant’s claims for damages as ill-founded, without giving reasons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103JUD000838408
3 novembre 2015
The checks had shown a constant improvement in the applicant’s attitude. The regime was eventually lifted from the applicant on 25 November 2010. 80.