AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC003201509
27 mars 2012
27 mars 2012
The applicant submitted that he had been denied a fair hearing on the basis of a wrongful assessment of the facts and evidence and an inadequate expert report and that he had been convicted despite a lack
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2603051-2832357
15 janvier 2009
15 janvier 2009
The court noted in particular that, while the author had claimed to be aware that his had been a “difficult task”, to have been acting out of duty and to have had no choice in the matter, and had expressed
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD003778905
10 février 2011
10 février 2011
The applicant complained that his deprivation of liberty on 25 May 2004 had been arbitrary and that his subsequent continued detention had been unjustifiably long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC002371604
27 juin 2017
27 juin 2017
constituted, namely the distribution of shares, had been accomplished.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2225353-2370022
10 janvier 2008
10 janvier 2008
She argued that the consent she had given on 19 February 2002 had been invalid on account of the family pressure exerted on her and because she had not been fully aware of the consequences of registering
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC000350306
11 mai 2010
11 mai 2010
subsequently acquitted or where the criminal proceedings have been terminated on the ground that no offence has been committed.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2739222-2991828
28 mai 2009
28 mai 2009
European Convention on Human Rights on account of the fact that the applicant, having been born outside of marriage, was unable to assert her inheritance rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC002170305
7 octobre 2008
7 octobre 2008
Thereby Article 5 § 4 had been violated. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0908DEC003124003
8 septembre 2009
8 septembre 2009
under Article 5 §§ 1 (c) and 3 of the Convention - that his detention on the territory of Ukraine had been unlawful and had not been reviewed by the courts; 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0831DEC004208602
31 août 2006
31 août 2006
The State Security Court was then convinced that the applicant had committed the above-mentioned offences which had been verified by the content of the file.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610DEC005647813
10 juin 2014
10 juin 2014
above application lodged on 5 September 2013, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC003736305
17 novembre 2009
17 novembre 2009
The State Security Court was then convinced that the applicant had committed the above-mentioned offences which had been verified by the content of the file.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2402041-2600818
30 juin 2008
30 juin 2008
of their duties and had been punished.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2520341-2732820
21 octobre 2008
21 octobre 2008
had been a violation of Article 8.
Source officiellePôle 1 - Chambre 11
6a1fb99bcdc6046d47e937af
2 juin 2026
2 juin 2026
décision : B N° RG 26/03098 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7K-CNJX7 Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 29 mai 2026, à 11h00, par le magistrat du siège du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Laurent Ben-Kemoun
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002291202
17 février 2009
17 février 2009
He stated that the time-limit for lodging a cassation appeal had been reduced and he still had not received a copy of the court of appeal decision.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1833424-1923806
6 novembre 2006
6 novembre 2006
Mr Kovačić also complained that he had been discriminated against on the grounds of nationality, in that Slovenian account holders of the Zagreb branch had been allowed to withdraw their savings
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68268-68736
27 avril 2000
27 avril 2000
She referred to the fresh statement and maintained that if this information had been available in the lower courts the outcome of the case would have been a different one.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1976605-2083081
5 avril 2007
5 avril 2007
Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Ms Ilıcak also complained that she had been unfairly deprived of the benefit of her parliamentary remuneration.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2569490-2781270
4 décembre 2008
4 décembre 2008
Accordingly, the Court concluded that the interference in question had been justified as a matter of principle and had been proportionate to the aim pursued.
Source officiellePage 73 sur 4750
Bernier, Matthieu Laurent Bernard Michel
16/07/2026
Voir →
BAPTISTE, Bernie
14/07/2026
Voir →
BERNIER, Luis
Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif — Jugement prononçant la clôture de la procédure de liquidation judiciaire pour insuffisance d'actif.
12/07/2026
Voir →
SEL BERNIER
09/07/2026
Voir →
BERNIE
09/07/2026
Voir →