CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0205JUD001376904
5 février 2009
Such measures form part of the diligence which the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner” (see Sadak and Others
Page 72 sur 74
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0804JUD000511315
4 août 2020
employed are not disproportionate or arbitrary (see Davydov and Others , cited above, § 272; see also Paksas , cited above, § 96 ‑ 97; Tănase , cited above, §§ 161-62; and Dicle and Sadak
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002081512
4 septembre 2018
İnan AKMEŞE Article 5 § 4 de la Convention Dommage moral réclamé : 10 000 EUR (dix mille euros) Frais et dépens réclamé : 7 434 TRY (environ 1 450 EUR) 43311/13 21 mai 2012 Hakzan SADAK
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD004708212
29 mars 2016
to satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 3 (d), which requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses testifying against him (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000111102
4 décembre 2008
witnesses against him, such measures being part of the diligence the Contracting States must exercise in order to ensure that the rights guaranteed by Article 6 are enjoyed in an effective manner (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1025JUD004438704
25 octobre 2011
/04/2003 115,830 116,640 21648/08 24/03/2008 Andrey Viktorovich FOMINYKH 19/09/1979 Rostov-on-Don Garrison Military Court 28/09/2004 516,400.32 42081/08 17/07/2008 Samat
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0701JUD003668197
1 juillet 2004
26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV; and Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no. 2) , nos. 25144/94, 26149/95 to 26154/95, 27100/95 and 27101/95, § 31, ECHR 2002-IV). 55.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0228JUD001846906
28 février 2012
Greece , 1 July 1997, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV; and Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey [GC], no. 10226/03, § 109 (iii), 8 July 2008). 38.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222717
20 décembre 2022
Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to organise elections “under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (see, for example, Yumak and Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD002296308
10 juillet 2018
of its finding of a violation under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see paragraph 55 above), the Court considers that there is no need to make a separate ruling on these complaints (see Sadak
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD003168821
18 septembre 2025
record had been drawn up, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000 40967/22 11/08/2022 Samat
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2027112-2150468
7 juin 2007
No violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Botmeh and Alami v. the United Kingdom (no. 15187/03) The applicants, Jawad Botmeh and Samar Alami, are Palestinian nationals who were born
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC004404719
28 avril 2020
In addition, he noted that under the Estonian law he had a right to receive maintenance ( ülalpidamist saama ) from his children.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-69846
7 juin 2005
Two recent judgments of the Court of Cassation – one dealing with the re-trial of Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Doğan, and the other one concerning the surveillance of telephone conversations – highlight
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD003355403
15 juin 2006
Furthermore, the Court has considered that this Article guarantees the individual’s right to stand for election and, once elected, to sit as a member of parliament (see Sadak and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127JUD005356109
27 novembre 2018
Sadak, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The second applicant, Ahmet Urat, was represented by Mr E. Özkan, a lawyer practising in Diyarbakır.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003388205
15 octobre 2013
xa0; Paragraph 1 of Article 6 taken together with paragraph 3 requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD001786404
19 juillet 2007
such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD000457007
10 juillet 2012
41461/02, § 98, 24 July 2008), and secondly, that the Contracting States are required to take positive steps, in particular to enable an accused to examine or have examined witnesses against him (see Sadak
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD003897803
27 mai 2008