CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

23 798 résultats pour « Held Sutter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176685

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance

Page 72 sur 1190

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0411JUD007209212

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2017

11 avril 2017

Accordingly, the employer could not be held responsible for the workers’ decision to carry the platform on the scaffolding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124JUD001746707

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2015

24 novembre 2015

previously, for construction of an individual house, in the city or rural area where the previously held land was situated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD005751909

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

At some point they loosened the rope and he fell onto his head. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022JUD003919798

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2002

22 octobre 2002

His total claim under this head amounted to GBP 12,427. 50.     The Government submitted that the sums claimed were notional, and not legal costs actually incurred by the applicant. 51.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD004344415

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

    The first applicant did not claim any sums for costs and expenses. The second applicant claimed EUR 1,500 for the costs and expenses incurred before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD002905902

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2008

4 novembre 2008

    In the course of the proceedings the assize court held investigatory sittings on a regular basis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113182

Admin. suprême

30 août 2012

30 août 2012

Not every inmate was willing to help which added frustration and embarrassment to the already sensitive situation for the applicant who suffers from enuresis and encopresis.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2164889-2321152

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2007

13 novembre 2007

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court held unanimously that in Driza , Albania was to return to the applicant a 1,650   m² plot of land plus 50,000   euros   (EUR).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55565

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 1993

21 septembre 1993

that there had been no breach of Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2 (art. 6-1, art. 6-2);        -   held that there had been a breach of Article 6, paragraph 3.c (art. 6-3-c)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD002507202

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2007

31 mai 2007

    From 26 February to 4 June 1996 the District Court held preparatory oral hearings. At the parties’ request, the case was adjourned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214JUD005176899

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2004

14 décembre 2004

    Between 6 September 1995 and 24 November 1999 no hearings were held. 25.     Subsequently, the trial court held hearings on 25   November and 17   December 1999. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155544

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2015

27 mai 2015

She further complains under the same head about the national authorities’ failure to provide her with medical care despite the fact that she suffers from hepatitis C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000770906

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2013

18 juillet 2013

    On 28 March 2006 the court held a hearing and delivered a judgment, rejecting the applicant’s request. She appealed. 11.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1497079-1565996

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

From 16 February 2000 to 28 May 2004 the applicant was held in detention facility no. OD-1/T-2 of the Vladimir Region.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208JUD003539697

Admin. suprême

8 février 2000

8 février 2000

Public hearings at which witnesses gave evidence before the investigating judge were held on 19, 20 and 25 April and 3 and 4 May 1994. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0613DEC004392298

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2006

13 juin 2006

    The applicant complained that he had been subjected to ill-treatment and denied adequate medical assistance while held in police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0910REP002939295

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1999

10 septembre 1999

  The hearing was held on 26 May 1998 in Strasbourg.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1212JUD002386502

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

    On 28 September 2001 and 14 January 2002 the Regional Court held hearings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0702JUD005997408

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2015

2 juillet 2015

    On 26 March 2008 the Supreme Court held a session ( седница ) in the presence of the public prosecutor.

Source officielle