Damage 80.     The applicant claimed 4,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 81.     The Government contested that claim. 82.

    Damage 57.     The applicant claimed 40,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 58.

The Chief Constable concluded that this made it necessary to apply for the prohibition order so that effective policing could be carried out.

On 15 November 1999, the investigating officer submitted his final report to the PCA and sent a copy to the Chief Constable.

Constant weakness, drowsiness and a high temperature prevented her from going outside for walks. On 12 December 2003 Olga Biliak started to lose herself in time.

It also awarded the applicant 1,000 Turkish liras [1] in compensation for non-pecuniary damage.

The applicant cited a domestic court judgment in which damages had been awarded but never paid to the Roma families.

    Damage 75.     The applicant claimed 500,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 76.

the Municipality had not realised the town planning project and declined to buy the concerned premises for an adequate price, the applicant claimed 820,750   ATS (approximately 59,650 EUR) in damages

  Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Case Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total Paid on F.C.B.

As the Company allegedly failed to honour this agreement and as other disputes arose, the Applicant filed in November, 1960, a suit before the Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) of Braunschweig claiming damages

situé [Adresse 6] W1W 7LT LONDRES ROYAUME UNI Représentée par Me Florence GUERRE de la SELARL PELLERIN - DE MARIA - GUERRE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0018, Assistée de Me Reinhard DAMMANN

s) and 23 day(s)   Timișoara Prison 27/02/2017 to 13/09/2017 6 month(s) and 18 day(s) 2-2.40 m²             2 m 2 overcrowding (save for Arad Prison), bunk beds, constant

He also noted damage to the wooden door on the third floor.

Chief Constable, loc. cit.). 22.

A claim for aggravated damages was made mainly as regards the article of 7 February 2001.

There was constant noise from water dripping in the broken lavatory; the tap water was so rusty he could not drink it.

At the police station, he had been detained alone in a cell and “without constant supervision” of the police.

Although that risk could only be contained by constant supervision, this need could be met at Yarl’s Wood. Hospital admission would not provide management different to that. 34.