CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC006187800

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 2 May 2000 and was rejected on 18 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

Page 72 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC18 résultats

Journal officiel
Créations

SCI BECHAUD PAUL

SIREN 101185460Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Pontoise

19/02/2026

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — avis de dépôt de l’état de collocation au greffe du tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

27/11/2022

Voir →

Créations

OCCAZOU, Guipon, Christine Madeleine, Bechaud

SIREN 312308695Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Poitiers

13/11/2022

Voir →

Procédures collectives

BECHAUD, Benjamin

Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Nantes

Dépôt de l'état de collocation — Avis de dépôt de l’état des créances au Greffe du Tribunal judiciaire de Nantes. Les contestations seront recevables auprès du greffe du juge de l’exécution de ce tribunal dans un délai de trente jours à compter de la date de la présente publication. Publication légale : Informateur judiciaire le 23 septembre 2022. N° RG : 19/03493

31/10/2022

Voir →

Ventes et cessions

Bella Pizza, BECHAUD, RICHARD, Simon, Floriane

SIREN 908685001Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Avignon

Acte en date du 14/12/2021 enregistré au AVIGNON1 le 20/12/2021 sous le numéro 8404P01 2021 A 04467, Adresse du nouveau propriétaire: 19 Avenue des Ramades Impasse des Marmoussets 84150 Jonquières

04/01/2022

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248743

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2026

23 janvier 2026

They argued that in the given context the statements had amounted to hate speech of which they had been a target because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0510DEC006012316

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2022

10 mai 2022

    At the hearing held on that same day, the respondent requested adjournment because the applicant’s submissions had been voluminous and filed belatedly for a proper reply.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159852

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2015

14 décembre 2015

The lawyer expressed his intention to defend the applicant’s rights, but informed the investigator that he could not assist the applicant at that moment because of his workload.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC007870114

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

courts, complained under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention that his expulsion from Sweden to Iran would expose him to a real risk of being sentenced to death or subjected to torture or ill-treatment because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2427

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2007

8 novembre 2007

The Regional Court then the Supreme Court found that the sale was null and void because it had contravened the applicable regulation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0923DEC002360613

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2021

23 septembre 2021

of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the court of appeal had not been competent to quash the lower court’s decision in his case in so far as it concerned his supplementary pension because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118707

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2013

22 mars 2013

Because he had gained their trust in this way, al-Shabaab had agreed that he seek his parents’ permission to join them – even though they would have forced him to join them even without that permission

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001397888

Admin. suprême

19 février 1991

19 février 1991

  On 22 March 1982 the hearing was adjourned because some of the accused were absent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC000845903

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

refused because her occupancy of the flat was considered unlawful. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928DEC000015103

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2006

28 septembre 2006

He further claimed that such closure of the newspaper was unlawful, because the court could not order a liquidation of a legal entity based on a defamation complaint made by an individual.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001628703

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2010

26 janvier 2010

    The applicant complained under Article 14 that he had been discriminated against because of his political opinions. THE LAW I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217DEC003629408

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2013

17 décembre 2013

    On 4 January 1996 the Dresden District Court ordered the compulsory auction of the plot because of the B. company’s insolvency. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126646

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2013

2 septembre 2013

It has been decided that your client should be detained because: Your client is likely to abscond if given temporary admission or release.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0521DEC004760310

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2013

21 mai 2013

It held inter alia that it was unlikely that his wife aided him because they had been separated de facto for years and they did not have any contact with each other.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC006022309

Admin. suprême

18 février 2014

18 février 2014

and approval’ of the provider of the flat and entirely fulfilled the obligations of protected tenants is irrelevant ... as regards their lack of status as holders of a specially protected tenancy ... because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC006856113

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

), because she suggested that Mr   W.R. had known about the fraud but had not reported it; (iv) “Not only does he have a desire to become head of the association office, at which he aims at any price

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186570

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2018

5 septembre 2018

They introduced themselves and explained that his wife had called them because of his violent and inappropriate behaviour towards her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC000027203

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2006

23 mai 2006

    The applicant complained under Article 10 of the Convention that she had been dismissed from her job solely because she had criticised the management of AZAL in her letter to the President

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1222JUD002088604

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2009

22 décembre 2009

Between 25 November 1999 and 3 October 2000 the District Court listed eight hearings, of which three were adjourned because the defendants failed to attend and five because none of the parties attended

Source officielle