CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602JUD000600910
2 juin 2015
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)
Page 71 sur 3453
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9072
12 novembre 2013
Sweden [GC] - 5786/08 Judgment 12.11.2013 [GC] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life Lack of clear statutory provisions criminalising act of covertly filming a naked child
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD006165408
3 juillet 2012
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD001417123
12 novembre 2024
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608
Chapter 29, Article 6 “...Where a private claim is joined to the prosecution, the court’s finding of criminal liability shall be binding for the adjudication of the private claim.”
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0919JUD005882812
19 septembre 2024
The Court reiterates that the need to apply to the domestic courts for protection of their couple’s ordinary needs is in itself an obstacle to respect for their private and family life (see Koilova and
ECLI:CEDH:002-13390
7 septembre 2021
(b) Merits – As the interference with the applicant’s private life had been caused by a private individual rather than by the State, her complaints fell to be examined from the perspective
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD000632515
22 décembre 2020
There appeared, therefore, to be no overriding private interest in him staying in Switzerland. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD007803014
27 février 2025
Having deliberated in private on 30 January 2025, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD000958821
Expulsion would thus amount to interference with his right to respect for private and family life – see Article 8 § 1 [of the Convention].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD003574021
5 septembre 2023
DENMARK (Application no. 35740/21) JUDGMENT Art 8 • Expulsion • Private and family life • Expulsion order with a permanent re-entry ban following convictions for serious offences •
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409JUD005130122
9 avril 2024
Expulsion would thus amount to interference with the defendant’s right to respect for her private and family life under Article 8 § 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD004254118
11 janvier 2024
It concluded that the offence was not sufficiently proven.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD004314008
18 juin 2019
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD005543109
26 mars 2020
ECLI:CEDH:002-7248
9 octobre 2012
A person’s home address thus constituted personal data or information which fell within the scope of private life and as such was eligible for the protection granted to the latter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907JUD002751614
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CO00616
26 avril 2017
identifiées « PRIVATE » de l'inventaire des fichiers saisis sur l'ordinateur de M.
ADLC
ADLC:02-D-26
9 avril 2002
relative à une saisine de la société Prieur Sports dans le secteur de la distribution des équipements d'escrime
8 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007858402
4 mars 1996
X... se prévale des dispositions relatives à l'inopposabilité des délais de recours prévues par l'article R.104 du code des tribunaux administratifs et des cours administratives d'appel ; que sa demande