deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS        The applicant, a German citizen, born in 1948, is presently detained at the Stein prison in Krems

xa0;         The Vienna Economic Police and the Upper Austrian Police Directorate submitted extensive reports on the inquiries made to the investigating judge at the Krems

) against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Bulgarian national, Mr Krum

    At around 9 a.m. on 8 April 2007 the applicant was arrested by traffic police officers in Ussuriysk, a city in Primorskiy Kray. He was taken to the Ussuriysk police station ( УВД г.

upon the decision of the relevant Council if, inter alia , he or she has been identified as a defendant ( të   pandehurit ) in a case involving a serious crime committed with intent ( një   krim

          On 12 May 1989 the Krems Regional Court dismissed the applicant's request to institute criminal proceedings against the prison officer who had opened the

requirements of Article 13 being absorbed by those of Article 6 § 1 (see, among other authorities, British-American Tobacco Company Ltd v. the Netherlands , 20 November 1995, § 89, Series A no. 331, and Berger-Krall

[family name], now aged 41, made the headlines even while in prison in Krems, for instance at the first letter bomb trial. His release today, however, took place without much ado.

EUR 10,000 (no interest, no costs) 25/07/1961 Novi Sad, Serbia 13 Ljubica KNEŽEVIĆ (the thirteenth applicant) the same - EUR 20,000 with interest - EUR 409,25 17/10/1961 Nevesinje, BIH 14 Radislavka KRAMAR

border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 14717/04 Cornelia BERGER-KRALL

Referring to the Court’s case-law concerning Article 10 of the Convention, including the cases of   Kras ulya v. Russia (no. 12365/03, 22   February 2007), Godlevskiy v.

authors of this manifesto is conveyed by the celebration of what they seek to portray as great deeds; thus, equal prominence is given, for example, to the victory at Verdun and the defeat at Abd-el-Krim

a prosecutor of a constituent part of the Russian Federation ... may, not later than five days before the expiry of the maximum time-limit for remand in custody, apply to the judge of the “oblast”, “krai

The Government pointed out that such liability generally existed only in the case of flagrant abuses ( krasse Missbrauchsfälle ), on account of the principle of judicial independence.

Government’s argument that they did not fulfil the statutory conditions in that only those tenants who had acquired a “specially protected tenancy” or an “occupancy right” ( stanovanjska pravica – see Berger-Krall

I was arrested on 3 November 2000 in the town of Feodosiya, in the Krym Region.

between 15 June 2005 and 7 August 2005 and one on 8 August 2005, and sentenced him to one and a half years’ imprisonment for a single crime of “extended burglary” ( jedno produženo krivično delo teške krađe

  Eventually it became necessary to provide for more intensive care in the Krems civil hospital.

    On the same day, both the Krems public prosecutor’s office ( Staatsanwaltschaft ) and the Austrian Federal Armed Forces instituted investigations into T.P.’s death under Articles 80 and 81