banque), filiale de droit luxembourgeois d'une banque de droit islandais, un prêt « Equity Release » d'un montant de 7 850 000 euros, diminué ensuite à concurrence de 4 000 000 euros, remboursable in fine

en fixant au 26 juin 1994, la date de la dissolution de la société ; Attendu que pour prononcer la dissolution de la société en fixant la date au 26 juin 1994, en application de l'article 15 in fine

International PLC, aux droits de laquelle vient la société Citibank Europe PLC (la société Citibank), a consenti un prêt à la société Findi d'un montant principal de 61 900 000 euros, remboursable in fine

In addition to the confiscation the applicant was fined 3,000 Romanian lei (approximately 750 euros (EUR)).

She was fined LTL 240 (about EUR 69.50).

Under section 49(2) such a minor offence is punishable with a maximum fine of SKK 3,000. 21.

  On 4 October 1990 the Visp single judge dismissed the first applicant's appeal and confirmed the fine determined by the Department of Finance.

Before a court ruled on his application, on 8 September 2011 he paid the fine.

They were fined 25,000 Macedonian denars (MKD).

In October 2003, the applicant was convicted of speeding in the Magistrates’ Court and fined GBP 60, with his licence to be endorsed with three penalty points.

.) - 62746/00 Decision 14.11.2002 [Section III] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Publisher fined for naming police officer under investigation regarding death of asylum seeker: inadmissible

  Summary of the facts     On 14 January 1994 the applicant was convicted of a speeding offence by Beaune Police Court, which fined him 1,500 French francs (FRF) and banned him from driving

In a decision of April 2003 it fined the company six   million euros for unfair competition on the market for diabetes diagnostic tests, stating that the penalty should serve as a deterrent to all

On the same day the Vukovar Customs Office ( Carinarnica Vukovar ) found the applicant guilty of a minor offence under the Excise Tax Act for the use of the prohibited fuel in his truck and fined him with

On 2 October 2018 the applicant and other heirs were fined by the National Construction and Urban Planning Inspectorate and a second decision to demolish the wall was issued.

In the resumed proceedings, the court mitigated the punishment expressly on account of the protraction of the case and only fined the applicant, a recidivist, for an amount of approximately 600 euros,

Each of the applicants was fined an approximate sum of 110   euros, under Article 26 (1) (d) of Law No.   60/1991, for participating in unauthorised demonstrations.

As a consequence, the applicant received a large number of motor-vehicle tax assessments and was on many occasions prosecuted and fined in respect of offences committed with those vehicles.

On 13 July 2008 enforcement proceedings were initiated in respect of the fine imposed on the applicant in the criminal case no. 1-457/05.