Damage 72.

    Damage 70.     The applicant claimed 15,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 71.     The Government considered the claim excessive. 72.

It furthermore considered that the applicant’s state of health did not prevent his further detention, regard being had to the constant medical supervision and the appropriate quality of care ensured by

    Damage 65.     The applicant claimed 50,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 66.     The Government considered the claim excessive. 67.

    Damage 77.     The applicant asked for compensation for non-pecuniary damage, leaving the determination of the exact sum to the Court's discretion. 78.

        As regards the alleged insults committed by police officers in the course of the applicant's detention, the Constitutional Court referred to its constant case-law

    Damage 61.     The applicant claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 62.

He also joined an action for damages to the private prosecution and sought compensation for mental suffering and pecuniary damage. 7.

The civil action should have been related to the events during the night of 16   March 2008 and to the damage to E.’s health resulting from it. 35.

    The Government maintained that the applicant’s detention from the time of his arrest until his conviction by the court had been under the constant control of the judicial authorities and

  S., was convicted as an accomplice to the offence of causing damage to the company's creditors.

      damage and to obtain compensation."

    Damage 57.

autre élément de preuve ; * CONSTATER qu'une jurisprudence constante rappelle que le juge du fond ne peut fonder sa décision exclusivement sur un rapport d'expertise amiable non-contradictoire; * CONSTATER

    The second applicant claimed 50,000   euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage.

En l'espèce, il est constant que l'action engagée par M.

She sought compensation for non-pecuniary damage in respect of the severe moral and physical suffering she had allegedly endured in connection with her enforced abortion.

On 19 December a further interim Direction was issued to the Chief Constable.

   On 30 November 1988 the Düsseldorf Regional Court dismissed a claim for damages brought by the ddp in reliance on the Court of Appeal’s judgment of 11 December 1986 (see paragraph 17 above