Berro-Lefevre, judges , and Mr V. Berger, Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 November 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Berro-Lefevre, judges , and Mr V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 November 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Berro-Lefevre, judges , and Mr V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 November 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

They also complained that they had not had an interpreter and that the decisions in their case had been written in Macedonian. THE LAW 1.

Mrs Vogt had been a member of the German Communist Party which had never been found anti ‑ constitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court.

It has been used exclusively as a summer cottage and has been registered as such. On the land there are also accessory buildings with a surface totalling 56   m 2 .

there had been a violation of Article 5 § 5 as regards the first applicant.

They had all been trained in the use of firearms and their movements and actions had been subject to the control and supervision of experienced senior officers   It had therefore not been shown that

It concluded that ideally Christopher Edwards and Richard Linford should not have been in prison and in practice they should not have been sharing a cell.

(“the applicant”), who was born in 1970 and lives in Bern (Switzerland) and was represented by Ms S.

The remaining 269 hectares had been designated for construction and leisure purposes. In 1939 this part had been sold to E.Z.

DEMANDE D'INDEMNITE DE LICENCIEMENT ET DE DOMMAGES-INTERETS POUR RUPTURE ABUSIVE DE SON CONTRAT DE TRAVAIL, AUX MOTIFS QU'IL N'AVAIT PAS DEMONTRE QU'IL EUT ETE EFFECTIVEMENT LICENCIE PAR LA SOCIETE BERNE

Il retient par ailleurs un objectif de densité minimale de 15 logements par hectare, pour ce qui est de la commune de La Bernerie-en-Retz.

had been excessive.

On 10 July 1998 the second applicant joined the proceedings, the car having actually been purchased by both spouses. On 31 July 2002 the District Court decided in the applicants’ favour.

  They appealed for the evidence to be disallowed, complaining that the Winner had been arrested illegally and that their detention on board for 13   days had also been illegal.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on Human Rights on account of a penalty imposed on the applicant

Her claim was refused on 1 October 2003, J having been found to have acted in good faith, as he had embarked on the treatment on the basis that his relationship with Ms Evans would continue.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention;   4.

  221, property assigned to public-service use is deemed to have been expropriated without the expropriation procedure having been followed.