He entered a business partnership with his father, the latter providing the start-up capital from the sale of the family home.

    Another video included in the case-file starts at 4.01 p.m.

He made a statement whereby he admitted to certain facts and denied others.

    The trial commenced before the Diyarbakır State Security Court.

    In the first place, the Government state that the applicant does not distinguish between the two rights and raises the issue of the delay in what appears to be a dual context, i.e. amounting

    The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general

(c)     Stroke (i)     Stara Zagora 22.

Their written statements were all identical. 25.

    The judge will have told the jury that the burden of proof remains upon the prosecution throughout and what the standard required is. 2.

  His counsel replied that the applicant refused to make any statements.   On 31 January 1979 an indictment was filed against the applicant and two co-accused, namely his brother and C.

    The victims gave statements to the police. 21.

The statement also called for the “deportation” of those responsible.

Before the start of their interview the applicants were cautioned. During the interview the applicants remained silent and did not reply to questions concerning the above-mentioned items.

When determining the sentence, it inter alia took account of the fact that a long time had elapsed since the start of the proceedings during which the applicant had been in a state of uncertainty about

State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement; (b)     that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what

is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what

must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what