He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Tedesco v.

The applicant appeared at one hearing on 25 August 2000.

of the Court intended to suggest asking at the hearing.

    The investigating judge set the hearing down for 13 October 2005. 9.

Four hearings took place during 1 - 21 July 1999. The defence counsel’s request that the trial be suspended for lack of time to prepare the applicant’s defence was rejected.

It appears that there was no oral hearing before the Fund.

The Court of Appeal held a public appeal hearing in the court building. It dismissed the appeal.

Failure of the above-mentioned persons to appear at the hearing, provided they were duly informed of the hearing date , is not a ground to adjourn the hearing.”

  Again, the applicant did not request an oral hearing.

Even though on 5 January, 25 May, 17 October and 20 December 2011 the applicant had urged the court to schedule a hearing, the first hearing in the case was held only on 12 March 2013.

  For these reasons the Court decided to continue the hearing on 7 October 1994.

Of those hearings, the second defendant was not duly summoned for the hearing of 9 July 2001, the same was ill for the next hearing on 8 October 2001 and the applicant’s lawyer fell gravely ill for the

#xa0;   Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk 30/07/2021 05/12/2020 30/07/2021 Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings

Court, without hearing the accused in person: violation Facts : The applicant was charged in connection with the death of another man during a brawl in a night-club.

Whilst the assigned counsel was aware of the date of the following hearing, neither he nor the applicant was informed of his appointment.

On 11 October 2010 the Court of Appeal held an oral hearing in which the lawyer of J.S. was present but the applicant or his lawyer were not.

The civil courts held an oral hearing at first, but not at second instance.

At the last hearing before the High Court of Cassation and Justice held on 28 May 2012, the applicant and the lawyer of his choice were absent.

It held its first hearing on 13   April 1993, in which it heard statements from the suspects. 8.