THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 6.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION (SPEEDINESS) 19.

  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 28.

Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-4 - Contrôle de la légalité de la détention;Introduire un recours);Non-violation de l'article 5 - Droit

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review)

    On 28 January 2016 the complaints concerning Article 5 § 3 and Article 5 § 4 were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 8.     The applicant complained of the excessive length of judicial review of detention before the ordinary courts.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 25.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 18.

    On 5 September 2014 the District Court changed the measure of restraint from detention to house arrest. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 8.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 14.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 12.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 8.     The applicant complained of the excessive length of judicial review of detention before the ordinary courts.

  78/2019 concerning the lawfulness of the detention order were not conducted “speedily” within the meaning of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 44.

  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 32.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 §   4 OF THE CONVENTION 17.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   4 OF THE CONVENTION 10.

He relied on Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “3.