Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC007745501
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629DEC003050403
29 juin 2006
29 juin 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628DEC001546704
28 juin 2007
28 juin 2007
Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 March 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0128DEC001360605
28 janvier 2010
28 janvier 2010
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013DEC001519003
13 octobre 2005
13 octobre 2005
Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 March 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC003474604
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC000275504
29 avril 2008
29 avril 2008
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officiellecr
6079a7f19ba5988459c4b67b
30 juin 1976
30 juin 1976
DU 13 JUILLET 1967 SUR LE REGLEMENT JUDICIAIRE ET LA LIQUIDATION DES BIENS, DES ARTICLES 29-3°, 31, 130 ET 131 DE LA MEME LOI, DE L'ARTICLE 327 DU CODE PENAL, DE L'ARTICLE 402 DU CODE PENAL, DE L'ARTICLE
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614DEC001343304
14 juin 2007
14 juin 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0912DEC006716601
12 septembre 2006
12 septembre 2006
Partant, il convient de mettre fin à l’application de l’article 29 § 3 et de rayer l’affaire du rôle.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC002806403
23 mai 2006
23 mai 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC002984903
18 mai 2006
18 mai 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711DEC001937205
11 juillet 2006
11 juillet 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC001113804
4 mai 2006
4 mai 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0921DEC002767604
21 septembre 2006
21 septembre 2006
En conséquence, il convient de mettre fin à l’application de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et de rayer l’affaire du rôle.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906DEC007652201
6 septembre 2007
6 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002596203
20 octobre 2005
20 octobre 2005
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1125DEC004341702
25 novembre 2004
25 novembre 2004
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC007155801
18 octobre 2005
18 octobre 2005
O’Boyle, greffier de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite devant la Commission européenne des Droits de l’Homme le 14 décembre 1997, Vu la décision de la Cour de se prévaloir de l’article 29
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC000334204
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officiellePage 7 sur 25551