CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003245704
27 novembre 2007
While the Garda had doubts as to their credibility, no further evidence was forthcoming to implicate them in the incidents, beyond any statements already made in other proceedings.
Page 7 sur 194
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161841
9 mars 2016
The period starts to run from the moment of the arrest of the accused ... and ends with the delivery of a judgment by a trial court at the first level of jurisdiction. 3.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD000888918
16 avril 2024
While that date was undisputed between the parties to the domestic civil proceedings, what was disputed between the parties was the date from which the three-year time-limit provided by law started to
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC004683618
14 mai 2024
(a fellow detainee of the applicant) made an incriminating statement to the police about what the applicant had told him of his involvement in the burglary. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0122DEC004866299
22 janvier 2002
1988. g) Proceedings before the Stuttgart Regional Court (2 KfH O 49/99) and the Stuttgart Court of Appeal (11 W 17/99) On 12 May 1999 the first and second applicants again applied to Stuttgart
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC006174700
17 juin 2008
Stewart, Fermanagh Citizen’s Advice Bureau. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Whomersley of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A.
ECLI:CEDH:001-151101
14 janvier 2015
She was prescribed a course of chemotherapy, which was to start several days after the operation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711DEC001919123
11 juillet 2024
In particular, the Court notes that the time-limit for lodging an application starts running from the date on which the applicant and/or his or her representative has sufficient knowledge of the final
ECLI:CEDH:001-192824
5 avril 2019
The applicants allege that S.H. in fact refused to answer their questions by repeatedly claiming either not to remember what had happened or not to know the answer.
ECLI:CEDH:001-183738
14 mai 2018
If so, what was the date of the final decision? 2.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5629
29 janvier 2002
In September 1997 the applicants lodged a petition with the office of the public prosecutor of the State Security Court in order to obtain information about the investigation.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10194
18 novembre 2014
While he was being questioned by the investigating judge, his lawyer was allowed to enter the hearing room but not to take the floor or advise his client.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14592
21 avril 2026
What was required from States was that the review entailed either the executive giving reasons or judicial review, so that the appearance of arbitrariness was avoided.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0901DEC001766791
1 septembre 1993
The decision, which aims at combating dental caries, states: <Translation> "The Greater Council of the Canton of Basel-Stadt approves,
ECLI:CEDH:002-11775
12 décembre 2017
Some fifteen years had passed since the ratification of the Convention by both States without a political solution in sight.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11776
The respondent States had ratified the Convention ten years later, Azerbaijan on 15 April 2002 and Armenia on 26 April 2002.
ECLI:CEDH:001-206816
25 novembre 2020
On 8 May 2017 the latter decided not to start an investigation as the matter complained of did not involve a criminal offence. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0523JUD004418704
23 mai 2013
The Guidelines state as follows. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015DEC005197599
15 octobre 2002
He was ordered to start serving his prison term on 4 January 1999.
ECLI:CEDH:001-191319
28 janvier 2019
One of the officers then went behind the bench and, while holding a small plastic bag ( kesicu ) in his hand asked them: “Whose bag is this? Is it yours?”