CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003245704

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2007

27 novembre 2007

While the Garda had doubts as to their credibility, no further evidence was forthcoming to implicate them in the incidents, beyond any statements already made in other proceedings.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161841

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2016

9 mars 2016

The period starts to run from the moment of the arrest of the accused ... and ends with the delivery of a judgment by a trial court at the first level of jurisdiction. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD000888918

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

While that date was undisputed between the parties to the domestic civil proceedings, what was disputed between the parties was the date from which the three-year time-limit provided by law started to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0514DEC004683618

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2024

14 mai 2024

(a fellow detainee of the applicant) made an incriminating statement to the police about what the applicant had told him of his involvement in the burglary. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0122DEC004866299

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2002

22 janvier 2002

1988. g)     Proceedings before the Stuttgart Regional Court (2 KfH O 49/99) and the Stuttgart Court of Appeal (11 W 17/99) On 12 May 1999 the first and second applicants again applied to Stuttgart

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC006174700

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2008

17 juin 2008

Stewart, Fermanagh Citizen’s Advice Bureau. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Whomersley of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-151101

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2015

14 janvier 2015

She was prescribed a course of chemotherapy, which was to start several days after the operation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711DEC001919123

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

In particular, the Court notes that the time-limit for lodging an application starts running from the date on which the applicant and/or his or her representative has sufficient knowledge of the final

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192824

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2019

5 avril 2019

The applicants allege that S.H. in fact refused to answer their questions by repeatedly claiming either not to remember what had happened or not to know the answer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-183738

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2018

14 mai 2018

If so, what was the date of the final decision?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5629

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2002

29 janvier 2002

In September 1997 the applicants lodged a petition with the office of the public prosecutor of the State Security Court in order to obtain information about the investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10194

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2014

18 novembre 2014

While he was being questioned by the investigating judge, his lawyer was allowed to enter the hearing room but not to take the floor or advise his client.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14592

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2026

21 avril 2026

What was required from States was that the review entailed either the executive giving reasons or judicial review, so that the appearance of arbitrariness was avoided.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0901DEC001766791

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 1993

1 septembre 1993

  The decision, which aims at combating dental caries, states:   <Translation>         "The Greater Council of the Canton of Basel-Stadt approves,  &#

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11775

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

Some fifteen years had passed since the ratification of the Convention by both States without a political solution in sight.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11776

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

The respondent States had ratified the Convention ten years later, Azerbaijan on 15 April 2002 and Armenia on 26 April 2002.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206816

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2020

25 novembre 2020

On 8 May 2017 the latter decided not to start an investigation as the matter complained of did not involve a criminal offence. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0523JUD004418704

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2013

23 mai 2013

The Guidelines state as follows. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1015DEC005197599

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2002

15 octobre 2002

He was ordered to start serving his prison term on 4 January 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191319

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2019

28 janvier 2019

One of the officers then went behind the bench and, while holding a small plastic bag ( kesicu ) in his hand asked them: “Whose bag is this? Is it yours?”

Source officielle