CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC005362810
11 mars 2014
Dans un article intitulé « Les baraques de la rue Stroma » (« Baraki na Stromej »), le requérant imputait aux administrateurs le gaspillage de fonds de la coopérative en soutenant
Page 7 sur 9
3ème chambre 1ère section
67f80d3ccf40727a0043ba7c
10 avril 2025
janvier 2025 démontrent que le site « onlymp3 » met à disposition du public, sans autorisation, de très nombreux phonogrammes du répertoire de la SCPP, et notamment les albums suivants : L’enfer de Stromae
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD003948815
10 octobre 2024
Furthermore, specific grounds justifying the application of one of the exceptions that it lists exhaustively has to be established unequivocally at the time such a measure is taken (see Strogan v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0210JUD006438701
10 février 2005
his position as head of the municipal building office, deceived the joint owners of real estate as to the value of their property in order to induce them to sell it at a low price to a front man ( Strohmann
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0503JUD006418109
3 mai 2018
the alleged crime had been committed on 12/04/2012; it could not therefore be claimed that the authorities faced an urgent situation such as, for example, a situation of “in flagrante delicto” (see Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD001731708
15 octobre 2020
the inquiry officer can only take a limited number of steps and the victims have no formal status, meaning that they are excluded from effective participation in the procedure (see, mutatis mutandis, Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD004970918
12 septembre 2024
providing any details, that the applicants’ arrest was carried out immediately after the commission of a crime, and that there were unnamed witnesses or evidence pointing to them as the perpetrators ( Strogan
1ère chambre 1ère section
6162e0751120e9a89a34a5c5
5 janvier 2012
communication risquant de mettre en péril les intérêts des clients ainsi que d'une absence de relations avec les autres associés ; qu'en témoigne l'attestation rédigée par Mme [Y] [R] concernant le dossier Stromag
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD002438510
29 janvier 2019
effective remedy because the inquiring officer could only take a limited number of steps and the victim had no formal status, meaning his or her effective participation in the procedure was excluded (see Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD002475718
23 novembre 2021
The 2017 Human Rights Watch’s Report “In Chechnya, a Ruthless Strongman Orders Family Reunification” states: “Chechnya’s strongman, Ramzan Kadyrov, launched a program in June to reunite families
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC002356002
23 mars 2006
The applicant was suspected of having employed a front man ( Strohmann ) in order to disguise his own role in the real estate business.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD000897607
18 décembre 2018
because the inquiry officer can only take a limited number of steps and the victims have no formal status, meaning they are excluded from effective participation in the procedure (see, inter alia , Strogan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1104JUD006312613
4 novembre 2021
inquiry officer can only take a limited number of steps and the victims have no formal status, meaning that they are excluded from effective participation in the procedure (see, mutatis mutandis, Strogan
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226537
25 août 2011
26302/10 STORIMANS-VERHULST and 3 others v. Russia Art. 2, Art. 13, Art. 14 186. 59827/10 BIGANISHVILI and 4 others v.
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3646658-4138025
12 septembre 2011
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD003459006
11 juillet 2024
effective remedy, because an inquiring officer can only take a limited number of steps and a victim has no formal status, meaning that his or her effective participation in the procedure is excluded (see Strogan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD005781300
1 avril 2010
Stormann, M me I. Hager-Ruhs , conseillers ; – pour les requérants M es H. Kinz , W.L. Weh conseils .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD002948309
13 septembre 2016
16002/90, Commission Report of 13 October 1992, § 45; Strohal v. Austria , no. 20871/92, Commission decision of 7 April 1994; and a contrario, Gillberg v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD003949611
27 février 2018
pertinentes du code de procédure pénale de 1960 relatives aux mesures préventives (telles qu’en vigueur et libellées à l’époque des faits) sont citées notamment dans l’arrêt rendu par la Cour dans l’affaire Strogan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007
19 février 2013
Stormann, ministère fédéral de la Justice, M me A.